Differences between Rural and Urban Practices in the Response to the COVID-19 Pandemic: Outcomes from the PRICOV-19 Study in 38 Countries.

Petrazzuoli, Ferdinando; Collins, Claire; Van Poel, Esther; Tatsioni, Athina; Streit, Sven; Bojaj, Gazmend; Asenova, Radost; Hoffmann, Kathryn; Gabrani, Jonila; Klemenc-Ketis, Zalika; Rochfort, Andrée; Adler, Limor; Windak, Adam; Nessler, Katarzyna; Willems, Sara (2023). Differences between Rural and Urban Practices in the Response to the COVID-19 Pandemic: Outcomes from the PRICOV-19 Study in 38 Countries. International journal of environmental research and public health, 20(4), p. 3674. Molecular Diversity Preservation International MDPI 10.3390/ijerph20043674

[img]
Preview
Text
ijerph-20-03674-v3.pdf - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons: Attribution (CC-BY).

Download (711kB) | Preview

This paper explores the differences between rural and urban practices in the response to the COVID-19 pandemic, emphasizing aspects such as management of patient flow, infection prevention and control, information processing, communication and collaboration. Using a cross-sectional design, data were collected through the online PRICOV-19 questionnaire sent to general practices in 38 countries. Rural practices in our sample were smaller than urban-based practices. They reported an above-average number of old and multimorbid patients and a below-average number of patients with a migrant background or financial problems. Rural practices were less likely to provide leaflets and information, but were more likely to have ceased using the waiting room or to have made structural changes to their waiting room and to have changed their prescribing practices in terms of patients attending the practices. They were less likely to perform video consultations or use electronic prescription methods. Our findings show the existence of certain issues that could impact patient safety in rural areas more than in urban areas due to the underlying differences in population profile and supports. These could be used to plan the organization of care for similar future pandemic situations.

Item Type:

Journal Article (Original Article)

Division/Institute:

04 Faculty of Medicine > Medical Education > Institute of General Practice and Primary Care (BIHAM)

UniBE Contributor:

Streit, Sven

Subjects:

600 Technology > 610 Medicine & health
300 Social sciences, sociology & anthropology > 360 Social problems & social services

ISSN:

1661-7827

Publisher:

Molecular Diversity Preservation International MDPI

Language:

English

Submitter:

Pubmed Import

Date Deposited:

03 Mar 2023 16:48

Last Modified:

16 Mar 2023 11:19

Publisher DOI:

10.3390/ijerph20043674

PubMed ID:

36834369

Uncontrolled Keywords:

COVID-19 PRICOV-19 general practice international comparison primary health care quality of care rural urban

BORIS DOI:

10.48350/179253

URI:

https://boris.unibe.ch/id/eprint/179253

Actions (login required)

Edit item Edit item
Provide Feedback