Clarifying the muddy concept of home healthcare coordination: A comprehensive theoretical framework.

Möckli, Nathalie; Espinosa, J. Alberto; Simon, Michael; Meyer-Massetti, Carla; Zúñiga, Franziska (2023). Clarifying the muddy concept of home healthcare coordination: A comprehensive theoretical framework. Heliyon, 9(3), e14243. Elsevier 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e14243

Preview	Text M_ckli_Heliyon_2023.pdf - Published Version Available under License Creative Commons: Attribution (CC-BY). Download (3MB) | Preview
Preview	Text M_ckli_Heliyon_2023_AAM.pdf - Accepted Version Available under License Creative Commons: Attribution (CC-BY). Download (1MB) | Preview

Effective healthcare coordination is vital when such care is provided as a collaborative effort by many individuals and their task activities are interdependent. Coordination is necessary to ensure that care not only meets the needs of patients, but also avoids negative consequences for them due to omitted, inefficient, unnecessary, or even incorrect treatments. It also helps conserve resources. This has contributed to a rapid increase in articles on this subject.

Still, while care coordination topics are gaining the attention of researchers, there are a number of issues experienced, including the delineation of limitations, inconsistent definitions, and problems with measurement. Therefore, the aim of this article is to refine the concept of homecare coordination and provide a comprehensive theoretical framework, illustrated with examples from practice.

Focusing on this goal, we have reviewed the extant literature on the subject to develop a theoretical homecare coordination framework. The first intermediary goal was to integrate relevant concepts across multiple theories and frameworks into a unified synthesis. We do so in two parts: (1) analysis of extant coordination frameworks and theories; and (2) the presentation of our newly developed theoretical framework for homecare coordination.

The new framework differentiates clearly between coordination as a process—i.e., what people do to coordinate and coordination as an outcome—i.e., the state of coordination. Applying this distinction to both, measurement and interpretation of results helps avoid misleading conclusions. As a research outcome, our framework builds upon the extant coordination literature, considers the complex relationships among the various coordination-related factors and, while focusing on homecare, is applicable to various healthcare settings in general.

A nuanced differentiation and explanation of the elements involved enable a more consistent operationalization of the coordination concept. Additionally, as they explicitly address the healthcare system's micro, meso, and macro levels, they can be applied across diverse healthcare settings to investigate homecare coordination.

Interest & Impact

Downloads

53 since deposited on 16 Mar 2023
22 in the past 12 months

Citations

5 Citations in Web of Science ®
6 Citations in Scopus

Search

in Google Scholar™

Services

Actions (login required)

Edit item

Actions (login required)

Edit item