The effects of secondary stressors, social identity, and social support on perceived stress and resilience: Findings from the COVID-19 pandemic.

Ntontis, Evangelos; Blackburn, Angélique M; Han, Hyemin; Stöckli, Sabrina; Milfont, Taciano L; Tuominen, Jarno; Griffin, Siobhán M; Ikizer, Gözde; Jeftic, Alma; Chrona, Stavroula; Nasheedha, Aishath; Liutsko, Liudmila; Vestergren, Sara (2023). The effects of secondary stressors, social identity, and social support on perceived stress and resilience: Findings from the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of environmental psychology, 88(102007), p. 102007. Elsevier 10.1016/j.jenvp.2023.102007

[img]
Preview
Text
1-s2.0-S0272494423000555-main.pdf - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons: Attribution (CC-BY).

Download (1MB) | Preview

Primary stressors are direct outcomes of extreme events (e.g., viruses, floodwater) whereas secondary stressors stem from pre-disaster life circumstances and societal arrangements (e.g., illness, problematic pre-disaster policies) or from inefficient responses to the extreme event. Secondary stressors can cause significant long-term damage to people affected but are also tractable and amenable to change. In this study we explored the association between secondary stressors, social identity processes, social support, and perceived stress and resilience. Pre-registered analyses of data from the COVIDiSTRESS Global Survey Round II (N = 14,600; 43 countries) show that secondary stressors are positively associated with perceived stress and negatively associated with resilience, even when controlling for the effects of primary stressors. Being a woman or having lower socioeconomic status (SES) is associated with higher exposure to secondary stressors, higher perceived stress, and lower resilience. Importantly, social identification is positively associated with expected support and with increased resilience and lower perceived stress. However, neither gender, SES, or social identification moderated the relationship between secondary stressors and perceived stress and resilience. In conclusion, systemic reforms and the availability of social support are paramount to reducing the effects of secondary stressors.

Item Type:

Journal Article (Original Article)

Division/Institute:

03 Faculty of Business, Economics and Social Sciences > Department of Business Management > Institute of Innovation Management
03 Faculty of Business, Economics and Social Sciences > Department of Business Management > Institute of Innovation Management > Consumer Behavior

UniBE Contributor:

Stöckli, Sabrina (A)

Subjects:

600 Technology > 650 Management & public relations

ISSN:

0272-4944

Publisher:

Elsevier

Language:

English

Submitter:

Pubmed Import

Date Deposited:

13 Apr 2023 10:14

Last Modified:

16 Apr 2023 02:19

Publisher DOI:

10.1016/j.jenvp.2023.102007

PubMed ID:

37041753

Uncontrolled Keywords:

COVID-19 Primary stressors Resilience Secondary stressors Social identity Social support Stress

BORIS DOI:

10.48350/181688

URI:

https://boris.unibe.ch/id/eprint/181688

Actions (login required)

Edit item Edit item
Provide Feedback