Securing conservation Lebensraum? The geo-, bio-, and ontopolitics of global conservation futures

Bluwstein, Jevgeniy; Cavanagh, Connor; Fletcher, Robert (2023). Securing conservation Lebensraum? The geo-, bio-, and ontopolitics of global conservation futures. Geoforum, 153, p. 103752. Elsevier 10.1016/j.geoforum.2023.103752

Preview	Text Bluwstein_Cavanagh_Fletcher_2023_Securing_Conservation_Lebensraum.pdf - Published Version Available under License Creative Commons: Attribution (CC-BY). Download (515kB) | Preview
	Text Bluwstein_Cavanagh_Fletcher_2023_Securing_Conservation_Lebensraum.pdf Restricted to registered users only Available under License BORIS Standard License. Download (0B)

The geographical concept of Lebensraum ("living space") was coined most significantly by the German scholar Friedrich Ratzel towards the end of the nineteenth century. Through the lens of Lebensraum, Ratzel reformulated Darwin's conception of evolution as a "struggle for life" into a "struggle for space", highlighting how nonhuman species - as well as biologically conceived human 'races', nations, states, and empires - grew organically in space and colonized it. Although the concept attained considerable influence in the first half of the twentieth century, after World War II it largely fell into disrepute due to its various imperialist, colonialist, and fascist associations. Yet in some ways, contemporary academic debates concerning land and resource governance continue to implicitly or partially evoke the substance of certain Lebensraum conceptualizations. This is particularly so with respect to debates about global biodiversity conservation. Revisiting both Ratzelian and other fin-de-siecle theorizations of Lebensraum, we argue that contemporary efforts to reformulate conservation governance at the planetary scale risk amounting to a form of what we term "conservation Lebensraum", or a globally-significant "struggle for conservation space". Analysing the implications of conservation Lebensraum through a tripartite conceptual framework at the intersection of conservation biopolitics, geopolitics, and ontopolitics, we highlight how global biodiversity conservation initiatives seek to respond to multiple socio-ecological crises in the so-called Anthropocene. We end with a brief discussion of more socio-ecologically just alternatives to conservation Lebensraum, thereby contributing to critical conversations about the political ecology of emergent conservation futures.

Interest & Impact

Downloads

97 since deposited on 01 May 2023
82 in the past 12 months

Citations

5 Citations in Web of Science ®
6 Citations in Scopus

Search

in Google Scholar™

Services

Actions (login required)

Edit item

Actions (login required)

Edit item