Postoperative Impedance-Based Estimation of Cochlear Implant Electrode Insertion Depth.

Schraivogel, Stephan; Aebischer, Philipp; Wagner, Franca; Weder, Stefan; Mantokoudis, Georgios; Caversaccio, Marco; Wimmer, Wilhelm (2023). Postoperative Impedance-Based Estimation of Cochlear Implant Electrode Insertion Depth. Ear and hearing, 44(6), pp. 1379-1388. Wolters Kluwer Health 10.1097/AUD.0000000000001379

[img]
Preview
Text
Postoperative_Impedance_Based_Estimation_of.153.pdf - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons: Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works (CC-BY-NC-ND).

Download (841kB) | Preview

OBJECTIVES

Reliable determination of cochlear implant electrode positions shows promise for clinical applications, including anatomy-based fitting of audio processors or monitoring of electrode migration during follow-up. Currently, electrode positioning is measured using radiography. The primary objective of this study is to extend and validate an impedance-based method for estimating electrode insertion depths, which could serve as a radiation-free and cost-effective alternative to radiography. The secondary objective is to evaluate the reliability of the estimation method in the postoperative follow-up over several months.

DESIGN

The ground truth insertion depths were measured from postoperative computed tomography scans obtained from the records of 56 cases with an identical lateral wall electrode array. For each of these cases, impedance telemetry records were retrieved starting from the day of implantation up to a maximum observation period of 60 mo. Based on these recordings, the linear and angular electrode insertion depths were estimated using a phenomenological model. The estimates obtained were compared with the ground truth values to calculate the accuracy of the model.

RESULTS

Analysis of the long-term recordings using a linear mixed-effects model showed that postoperative tissue resistances remained stable throughout the follow-up period, except for the two most basal electrodes, which increased significantly over time (electrode 11: ~10 Ω/year, electrode 12: ~30 Ω/year). Inferred phenomenological models from early and late impedance telemetry recordings were not different. The insertion depth of all electrodes was estimated with an absolute error of 0.9 mm ± 0.6 mm or 22° ± 18° angle (mean ± SD).

CONCLUSIONS

Insertion depth estimations of the model were reliable over time when comparing two postoperative computed tomography scans of the same ear. Our results confirm that the impedance-based position estimation method can be applied to postoperative impedance telemetry recordings. Future work needs to address extracochlear electrode detection to increase the performance of the method.

Item Type:

Journal Article (Original Article)

Division/Institute:

04 Faculty of Medicine > Department of Head Organs and Neurology (DKNS) > Clinic of Ear, Nose and Throat Disorders (ENT)
10 Strategic Research Centers > ARTORG Center for Biomedical Engineering Research > ARTORG Center - Hearing Research Laboratory
04 Faculty of Medicine > Department of Radiology, Neuroradiology and Nuclear Medicine (DRNN) > Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology
10 Strategic Research Centers > ARTORG Center for Biomedical Engineering Research

UniBE Contributor:

Schraivogel, Stephan Christopher, Aebischer, Philipp, Wagner, Franca, Weder, Stefan Andreas, Mantokoudis, Georgios, Caversaccio, Marco, Wimmer, Wilhelm

Subjects:

600 Technology > 610 Medicine & health
500 Science > 570 Life sciences; biology

ISSN:

1538-4667

Publisher:

Wolters Kluwer Health

Language:

English

Submitter:

Pubmed Import

Date Deposited:

09 May 2023 15:36

Last Modified:

21 Oct 2023 00:12

Publisher DOI:

10.1097/AUD.0000000000001379

PubMed ID:

37157125

BORIS DOI:

10.48350/182410

URI:

https://boris.unibe.ch/id/eprint/182410

Actions (login required)

Edit item Edit item
Provide Feedback