Predictors of poor outcome following lumbar spinal fusion surgery: a prospective observational study to derive two clinical prediction rules using British Spine Registry data.

Rushton, Alison B; Jadhakhan, Feroz; Verra, Martin L; Emms, Andrew; Heneghan, Nicola R; Falla, Deborah; Reddington, Michael; Cole, Ashley A; Willems, Paul C; Benneker, Lorin; Selvey, David; Hutton, Michael; Heymans, Martijn W; Staal, J Bart (2023). Predictors of poor outcome following lumbar spinal fusion surgery: a prospective observational study to derive two clinical prediction rules using British Spine Registry data. European spine journal, 32(7), pp. 2303-2318. Springer 10.1007/s00586-023-07754-w

[img] Text
s00586-023-07754-w.pdf - Published Version
Restricted to registered users only
Available under License Publisher holds Copyright.
Author holds Copyright

Download (811kB)

PURPOSE

Lumbar spinal fusion surgery (LSFS) is common for lumbar degenerative disorders. The objective was to develop clinical prediction rules to identify which patients are likely to have a favourable outcome to inform decisions regarding surgery and rehabilitation.

METHODS

A prospective observational study recruited 600 (derivation) and 600 (internal validation) consecutive adult patients undergoing LSFS for degenerative lumbar disorder through the British Spine Registry. Definition of good outcome (6 weeks, 12 months) was reduction in pain intensity (Numerical Rating Scale, 0-10) and disability (Oswestry Disability Index, ODI 0-50) > 1.7 and 14.3, respectively. Linear and logistic regression models were fitted and regression coefficients, Odds ratios and 95% CIs reported.

RESULTS

Lower BMI, higher ODI and higher leg pain pre-operatively were predictive of good disability outcome, higher back pain was predictive of good back pain outcome, and no previous surgery and higher leg pain were predictive of good leg pain outcome; all at 6 weeks. Working and higher leg pain were predictive of good ODI and leg pain outcomes, higher back pain was predictive of good back pain outcome, and higher leg pain was predictive of good leg pain outcome at 12 months. Model performance demonstrated reasonable to good calibration and adequate/very good discrimination.

CONCLUSIONS

BMI, ODI, leg and back pain and previous surgery are important considerations pre-operatively to inform decisions for surgery. Pre-operative leg and back pain and work status are important considerations to inform decisions for management following surgery. Findings may inform clinical decision making regarding LSFS and associated rehabilitation.

Item Type:

Journal Article (Original Article)

Division/Institute:

04 Faculty of Medicine > Department of Orthopaedic, Plastic and Hand Surgery (DOPH) > Clinic of Orthopaedic Surgery
04 Faculty of Medicine > Pre-clinic Human Medicine > Institute of Physiology

UniBE Contributor:

Verra, Martin, Benneker, Lorin Michael

Subjects:

600 Technology > 610 Medicine & health

ISSN:

1432-0932

Publisher:

Springer

Language:

English

Submitter:

Pubmed Import

Date Deposited:

30 May 2023 10:52

Last Modified:

25 Jun 2023 00:18

Publisher DOI:

10.1007/s00586-023-07754-w

PubMed ID:

37237240

Uncontrolled Keywords:

Clinical prediction rules Lumbar spinal fusion surgery Prospective observational study Rehabilitation Surgery

BORIS DOI:

10.48350/182973

URI:

https://boris.unibe.ch/id/eprint/182973

Actions (login required)

Edit item Edit item
Provide Feedback