(HIIT-The Track) High-Intensity Interval Training for People with Parkinson's Disease: Individual Response Patterns of (Non-)Motor Symptoms and Blood-Based Biomarkers-A Crossover Single-Case Experimental Design.

Gomes, Elvira S Amaral; Van den Heuvel, Odile A; Rietberg, Marc B; De Groot, Vincent; Hirsch, Mark A; Van de Berg, Wilma D J; Jaspers, Richard T; Vriend, Chris; Vanbellingen, Tim; Van Wegen, Erwin E H (2023). (HIIT-The Track) High-Intensity Interval Training for People with Parkinson's Disease: Individual Response Patterns of (Non-)Motor Symptoms and Blood-Based Biomarkers-A Crossover Single-Case Experimental Design. Brain Sciences, 13(6) MDPI 10.3390/brainsci13060849

[img]
Preview
Text
brainsci-13-00849-v3.pdf - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons: Attribution (CC-BY).

Download (1MB) | Preview

INTRODUCTION

Physical exercise is receiving increasing interest as an augmentative non-pharmacological intervention in Parkinson's disease (PD). This pilot study primarily aimed to quantify individual response patterns of motor symptoms to alternating exercise modalities, along with non-motor functioning and blood biomarkers of neuroplasticity and neurodegeneration.

MATERIALS & METHODS

People with PD performed high-intensity interval training (HIIT) and continuous aerobic exercise (CAE) using a crossover single-case experimental design. A repeated assessment of outcome measures was conducted. The trajectories of outcome measures were visualized in time series plots and interpreted relative to the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) and smallest detectable change (SDC) or as a change in the positive or negative direction using trend lines.

RESULTS

Data of three participants were analyzed and engaging in physical exercise seemed beneficial for reducing motor symptoms. Participant 1 demonstrated improvement in motor function, independent of exercise modality; while for participant 2, such a clinically relevant (positive) change in motor function was only observed in response to CAE. Participant 3 showed improved motor function after HIIT, but no comparison could be made with CAE because of drop-out. Heterogeneous responses on secondary outcome measures were found, not only between exercise modalities but also among participants.

CONCLUSION

Though this study underpins the positive impact of physical exercise in the management of PD, large variability in individual response patterns to the interventions among participants makes it difficult to identify clear exercise-induced adaptations in functioning and blood biomarkers. Further research is needed to overcome methodological challenges in measuring individual response patterns.

Item Type:

Journal Article (Original Article)

Division/Institute:

10 Strategic Research Centers > ARTORG Center for Biomedical Engineering Research > ARTORG Center - Gerontechnology and Rehabilitation

UniBE Contributor:

Vanbellingen, Tim

Subjects:

600 Technology > 610 Medicine & health

ISSN:

2076-3425

Publisher:

MDPI

Language:

English

Submitter:

Pubmed Import

Date Deposited:

28 Jun 2023 15:38

Last Modified:

28 Jun 2023 15:47

Publisher DOI:

10.3390/brainsci13060849

PubMed ID:

37371330

Uncontrolled Keywords:

Parkinson’s disease brain-derived neurotrophic factor endurance training neurofilament proteins neuroprotection rehabilitation, exercise, high intensity interval training

BORIS DOI:

10.48350/184211

URI:

https://boris.unibe.ch/id/eprint/184211

Actions (login required)

Edit item Edit item
Provide Feedback