Exploring why European primary care physicians sometimes not think of, or act on, a possible cancer diagnosis? A qualitative study.

Hajdarevic, Senada; Högberg, Cecilia; Marzo-Castillejo, Mercè; Siliņa, Vija; Sawicka-Powierza, Jolanta; Esteva, Magadalena; Koskela, Tuomas; Petek, Davorina; Contreras-Martos, Sara; Mangione, Marcello; Ožvačić Adžić, Zlata; Asenova, Radost; Gašparović Babić, Svjetlana; Brekke, Mette; Buczkowski, Krzysztof; Buono, Nicola; Çifçili Saliha, Serap; Dinant, Geert-Jan; Doorn, Babette; Hoffman, Robert D; ... (2023). Exploring why European primary care physicians sometimes not think of, or act on, a possible cancer diagnosis? A qualitative study. BJGP Open, 7(4), BJGPO.2023.0029. Royal College of General Practitioners: BJGP Open 10.3399/BJGPO.2023.0029

Preview	Text Hajdarevic_BJGPOpen_2023.pdf - Published Version Available under License Creative Commons: Attribution (CC-BY). Download (1MB) | Preview
Preview	Text BJGPO.2023.0029.full.pdf - Accepted Version Available under License Creative Commons: Attribution (CC-BY). Download (921kB) | Preview

BACKGROUND

While Primary Care Physicians (PCPs) play a key role in cancer detection, they can find cancer diagnosis challenging, and some patients have considerable delays between presentation and onward referral.

AIM

This study explores European PCPs' experiences and views on cases where they considered that they had been slow to think of, or act on, a possible cancer diagnosis.

DESIGN & SETTING

A multicentre European qualitative study, based on an online survey with open-ended questions asking PCPs for their narratives about cases when they had missed a diagnosis of cancer.

METHOD

Using maximum variation sampling, PCPs in 23 European countries were asked to describe what happened in a case where they were slow to think of a cancer diagnosis, and for their views on why it happened. Thematic analysis was used to analyse the data.

RESULTS

A total of 158 PCPs completed the questionnaire. The main themes were: where patients' descriptions did not suggest cancer; when distracting factors reduced PCPs' suspicions of cancer; when patients' hesitancy delayed the diagnosis; where system factors hampered the diagnostic process; when PCPs felt that they had made a mistake; and inadequate communication.

CONCLUSION

The study identified six overarching themes which need to be addressed. Doing so should reduce morbidity and mortality in the small proportion of patients who have a significant, avoidable delay in their cancer diagnosis. The 'Swiss cheese' model of accident causation shows how the themes relate to each other.

Interest & Impact

Downloads

61 since deposited on 30 Jun 2023
45 in the past 12 months

Citations

5 Citations in Web of Science ®
6 Citations in Scopus

Search

in Google Scholar™

Services

Actions (login required)

Edit item

Actions (login required)

Edit item