Management of acute non-specific low back pain in the emergency department: do emergency physicians follow the guidelines? Results of a cross-sectional survey.

Jermini-Gianinazzi, Ilaria; Blum, Manuel; Trachsel, Maria; Trippolini, Maurizio Alen; Tochtermann, Nicole; Rimensberger, Caroline; Liechti, Fabian; Wertli, Maria M (2023). Management of acute non-specific low back pain in the emergency department: do emergency physicians follow the guidelines? Results of a cross-sectional survey. BMJ open, 13(8), e071893. BMJ Publishing Group 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-071893

[img]
Preview
Text
Jermini-Gianinazzi_BMJOpen_2023.pdf - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons: Attribution-Noncommercial (CC-BY-NC).

Download (753kB) | Preview

OBJECTIVES

Clinical guidelines for acute non-specific low back pain (LBP) recommend avoiding imaging studies or invasive treatments and to advise patients to stay active. The aim of this study was to evaluate the management of acute non-specific LBP in the emergency departments (ED).

SETTING

We invited all department chiefs of Swiss EDs and their physician staff to participate in a web-based survey using two clinical case vignettes of patients with acute non-specific LBP presenting to an ED. In both cases, no neurological deficits or red flags were present. Guideline adherence and low-value care was defined based on current guideline recommendations.

RESULTS

In total, 263 ED physicians completed at least one vignette, while 212 completed both vignettes (43% residents, 32% senior/attending physicians and 24% chief physicians). MRI was considered in 31% in vignette 1 and 65% in vignette 2. For pain management, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, paracetamol and metamizole were mostly used. A substantial proportion of ED physicians considered treatments with questionable benefit and/or increased risk for adverse events such as oral steroids (vignette 1, 12% and vignette 2, 19%), muscle relaxants (33% and 38%), long-acting strong opioids (25% and 33%) and spinal injections (22% and 43%). Although guidelines recommend staying active, 72% and 67% of ED physicians recommended activity restrictions.

CONCLUSION

Management of acute non-specific LBP in the ED was not in agreement with current guideline recommendations in a substantial proportion of ED physicians. Overuse of imaging studies, the use of long-acting opioids and muscle relaxants, as well as recommendations for activity and work restrictions were prevalent and may potentially be harmful.

Item Type:

Journal Article (Original Article)

Division/Institute:

04 Faculty of Medicine > Medical Education > Institute of General Practice and Primary Care (BIHAM)
04 Faculty of Medicine > Department of General Internal Medicine (DAIM) > Clinic of General Internal Medicine

UniBE Contributor:

Blum, Manuel, Trachsel, Maria, Tochtermann, Nicole, Rimensberger, Caroline, Liechti, Fabian

Subjects:

600 Technology > 610 Medicine & health
300 Social sciences, sociology & anthropology > 360 Social problems & social services

ISSN:

2044-6055

Publisher:

BMJ Publishing Group

Language:

English

Submitter:

Pubmed Import

Date Deposited:

09 Aug 2023 10:04

Last Modified:

21 Aug 2023 08:04

Publisher DOI:

10.1136/bmjopen-2023-071893

PubMed ID:

37541755

Additional Information:

Jermini-Gianinazzi and Blum contributed equally to this work.

Uncontrolled Keywords:

accident & emergency medicine education & training (see medical education & training) pain management

BORIS DOI:

10.48350/185241

URI:

https://boris.unibe.ch/id/eprint/185241

Actions (login required)

Edit item Edit item
Provide Feedback