Prediction of in-hospital bleeding in acutely ill medical patients: External validation of the IMPROVE bleeding risk score.

Villiger, Rahel; Juillard, Pauline; Darbellay Farhoumand, Pauline; Choffat, Damien; Tritschler, Tobias; Stalder, Odile; Rossel, Jean-Benoît; Aujesky, Drahomir; Méan, Marie; Baumgartner, Christine (2023). Prediction of in-hospital bleeding in acutely ill medical patients: External validation of the IMPROVE bleeding risk score. Thrombosis research, 230, pp. 37-44. Elsevier 10.1016/j.thromres.2023.08.003

[img]
Preview
Text
1-s2.0-S0049384823002293-main.pdf - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons: Attribution (CC-BY).

Download (982kB) | Preview

INTRODUCTION

Pharmacological thromboprophylaxis slightly increases bleeding risk. The only risk assessment model to predict bleeding in medical inpatients, the IMPROVE bleeding risk score, has never been validated using prospectively collected outcome data.

METHODS

We validated the IMPROVE bleeding risk score in a prospective multicenter cohort of medical inpatients. Primary outcome was in-hospital clinically relevant bleeding (CRB) within 14 days of admission, a secondary outcome was major bleeding (MB). We classified patients according to the score in high or low bleeding risk. We assessed the score's predictive performance by calculating subhazard ratios (sHRs) adjusted for thromboprophylaxis use, positive and negative predictive values (PPV, NPV), and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUC).

RESULTS

Of 1155 patients, 8 % were classified as high bleeding risk. CRB and MB within 14 days occurred in 0.94 % and 0.47 % of low-risk and in 5.6 % and 3.4 % of high-risk patients, respectively. Adjusted for thromboprophylaxis, classification in the high-risk group was associated with an increased risk of 14-day CRB (sHR 4.7, 95 % confidence interval [CI] 1.5-14.5) and MB (sHR 4.9, 95%CI 1.0-23.4). PPV was 5.6 % and 3.4 %, while NPV was 99.1 % and 99.5 % for CRB and MB, respectively. The AUC was 0.68 (95%CI 0.66-0.71) for CRB and 0.73 (95%CI 0.71-0.76) for MB.

CONCLUSION

The IMPROVE bleeding risk score showed moderate to good discriminatory power to predict bleeding in medical inpatients. The score may help identify patients at high risk of in-hospital bleeding, in whom careful assessment of the risk-benefit ratio of pharmacological thromboprophylaxis is warranted.

Item Type:

Journal Article (Original Article)

Division/Institute:

04 Faculty of Medicine > Department of General Internal Medicine (DAIM) > Clinic of General Internal Medicine
04 Faculty of Medicine > Department of General Internal Medicine (DAIM) > Clinic of General Internal Medicine > Centre of Competence for General Internal Medicine
04 Faculty of Medicine > Pre-clinic Human Medicine > Department of Clinical Research (DCR)

UniBE Contributor:

Villiger, Rahel Andrea, Tritschler, Tobias, Stalder, Odile, Rossel, Jean-Benoît, Aujesky, Drahomir, Baumgartner, Christine

Subjects:

600 Technology > 610 Medicine & health

ISSN:

0049-3848

Publisher:

Elsevier

Language:

English

Submitter:

Pubmed Import

Date Deposited:

29 Aug 2023 10:21

Last Modified:

20 Feb 2024 14:15

Publisher DOI:

10.1016/j.thromres.2023.08.003

PubMed ID:

37634309

Additional Information:

Marie Méan and Christine Baumgartner contributed equally to this work (co-last authorship).

Uncontrolled Keywords:

Bleeding IMPROVE bleeding risk Medical patients Validation Venous thromboembolism prophylaxis

BORIS DOI:

10.48350/185790

URI:

https://boris.unibe.ch/id/eprint/185790

Actions (login required)

Edit item Edit item
Provide Feedback