Ranta, Susanna; Motwani, Jayashree; Blatny, Jan; Bührlen, Martina; Carcao, Manuel; Chambost, Hervé; Escuriola, Carmen; Fischer, Kathelijn; Kartal-Kaess, Mutlu; de Kovel, Marloes; Kenet, Gili; Male, Christoph; Nolan, Beatrice; d'Oiron, Roseline; Olivieri, Martin; Zapotocka, Ester; Andersson, Nadine G; Königs, Christoph (2023). Dilemmas on emicizumab in children with haemophilia A: A survey of strategies from PedNet centres. Haemophilia, 29(5), pp. 1291-1298. Wiley 10.1111/hae.14847
|
Text
Haemophilia_-_2023_-_Ranta.pdf - Published Version Available under License Creative Commons: Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works (CC-BY-NC-ND). Download (311kB) | Preview |
INTRODUCTION
Haemophilia A care has changed with the introduction of emicizumab. Experience on the youngest children is still scarce and clinical practice varies between haemophilia treatment centres.
AIM
We aimed to assess the current clinical practice on emicizumab prophylaxis within PedNet, a collaborative research platform for paediatricians treating children with haemophilia.
METHODS
An electronic survey was sent to all PedNet members (n = 32) between October 2022 and February 2023. The survey included questions on the availability of emicizumab, on the practice of initiating prophylaxis in previously untreated or minimally treated patients (PUPs or MTPs) and emicizumab use in patients with or without inhibitors.
RESULTS
All but four centres (28/32; 88%) responded. Emicizumab was available in clinical practice in 25/28 centres (89%), and in 3/28 for selected patients only (e.g. with inhibitors). Emicizumab was the preferred choice for prophylaxis in PUPs or MTPs in 20/25 centres; most (85%) started emicizumab prophylaxis before 1 year of age (30% before 6 months of age) and without concomitant FVIII (16/20; 80%). After the loading dose, 13/28 centres administered the recommended dosing, while the others adjusted the interval of injections to give whole vials. In inhibitor patients, the use of emicizumab during ITI was common, with low-dose ITI being the preferred protocol.
CONCLUSION
Most centres choose to initiate prophylaxis with emicizumab before 12 months of age and without concomitant FVIII. In inhibitor patients, ITI is mostly given in addition to emicizumab, but there was no common practice on how to proceed after successful ITI.
Item Type: |
Journal Article (Original Article) |
---|---|
Division/Institute: |
04 Faculty of Medicine > Department of Gynaecology, Paediatrics and Endocrinology (DFKE) > Clinic of Paediatric Medicine 04 Faculty of Medicine > Department of Gynaecology, Paediatrics and Endocrinology (DFKE) > Clinic of Paediatric Medicine > Paediatric Haematology/Oncology |
UniBE Contributor: |
Kartal-Kaess, Mutlu |
Subjects: |
600 Technology > 610 Medicine & health |
ISSN: |
1365-2516 |
Publisher: |
Wiley |
Language: |
English |
Submitter: |
Pubmed Import |
Date Deposited: |
31 Aug 2023 08:26 |
Last Modified: |
09 Jan 2024 14:29 |
Publisher DOI: |
10.1111/hae.14847 |
PubMed ID: |
37647211 |
Uncontrolled Keywords: |
ITI PUPs children emicizumab inhibitors survey |
BORIS DOI: |
10.48350/185923 |
URI: |
https://boris.unibe.ch/id/eprint/185923 |