Overuse and underuse of thromboprophylaxis in medical inpatients.

Kocher, Barbara; Farhoumand, Pauline Darbellay; Pulver, Damiana; Kopp, Basil; Choffat, Damien; Tritschler, Tobias; Vollenweider, Peter; Reny, Jean-Luc; Rodondi, Nicolas; Aujesky, Drahomir; Méan, Marie; Baumgartner, Christine (2023). Overuse and underuse of thromboprophylaxis in medical inpatients. Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis, 7(6), e102184. Wiley 10.1016/j.rpth.2023.102184

[img]
Preview
Text
Kocher_ResPractThrombHaemost_2023.pdf - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons: Attribution (CC-BY).

Download (1MB) | Preview
[img]
Preview
Text
Kocher_ResPractThrombHaemost_2023_AAM.pdf - Accepted Version
Available under License Creative Commons: Attribution (CC-BY).

Download (1MB) | Preview

Background

Thromboprophylaxis (TPX) prescription is recommended in medical inpatients categorized as high risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) by validated risk assessment models (RAMs), but how various RAMs differ in categorizing patients in risk groups, and whether the choice of RAM influences estimates of appropriate TPX use is unknown.
Objectives

To determine the proportion of medical inpatients categorized as high or low risk according to validated RAMs, and to investigate the appropriateness of TPX prescription.

Methods

This is a prospective cohort study of acutely ill medical inpatients from three Swiss university hospitals. Participants were categorized as high or low risk of VTE by validated RAMs (i.e., the Padua, IMPROVE, simplified, and original Geneva score). We assessed prescription of any TPX at baseline. We considered TPX prescription in high-risk and no TPX prescription in low-risk patients as appropriate.

Results

Among 1352 medical inpatients, the proportion categorized as high risk ranged from 29.8% with the IMPROVE to 66.1% with the original Geneva score. Overall, 24.6% were consistently categorized as high risk, and 26.3% as low risk by all four RAMs. Depending on the RAM used, TPX prescription was appropriate in 58.7-63.3% of high-risk (i.e., 36.7-41.3% underuse) and 52.4-62.8% of low-risk patients (i.e., 37.2-47.6% overuse).

Conclusion

The proportion of medical inpatients considered as high or low VTE risk varied widely according to different RAMs. Only half of patients were consistently categorized in the same risk group by all RAMs. While TPX remains underused in high-risk patients, overuse in low-risk patients is even more pronounced.

Item Type:

Journal Article (Original Article)

Division/Institute:

04 Faculty of Medicine > Department of General Internal Medicine (DAIM) > Clinic of General Internal Medicine
04 Faculty of Medicine > Department of General Internal Medicine (DAIM) > Clinic of General Internal Medicine > Centre of Competence for General Internal Medicine
04 Faculty of Medicine > Medical Education > Institute of General Practice and Primary Care (BIHAM)

UniBE Contributor:

Tritschler, Tobias, Rodondi, Nicolas, Aujesky, Drahomir, Baumgartner, Christine

Subjects:

600 Technology > 610 Medicine & health
300 Social sciences, sociology & anthropology > 360 Social problems & social services

ISSN:

2475-0379

Publisher:

Wiley

Language:

English

Submitter:

Doris Kopp Heim

Date Deposited:

14 Sep 2023 13:11

Last Modified:

06 Oct 2023 10:37

Publisher DOI:

10.1016/j.rpth.2023.102184

PubMed ID:

37745158

Additional Information:

Méan and Baumgartner contributed equally to this work (co-last authorship).

BORIS DOI:

10.48350/186320

URI:

https://boris.unibe.ch/id/eprint/186320

Actions (login required)

Edit item Edit item
Provide Feedback