Stroke lesion size - Still a useful biomarker for stroke severity and outcome in times of high-dimensional models.

Sperber, Christoph; Gallucci, Laura; Mirman, Daniel; Arnold, Marcel; Umarova, Roza M (2023). Stroke lesion size - Still a useful biomarker for stroke severity and outcome in times of high-dimensional models. NeuroImage: Clinical, 40, p. 103511. Elsevier 10.1016/j.nicl.2023.103511

Preview

Text 1-s2.0-S2213158223002024-main.pdf - Published Version Available under License Creative Commons: Attribution (CC-BY). Download (2MB) | Preview

BACKGROUND

The volumetric size of a brain lesion is a frequently used stroke biomarker. It stands out among most imaging biomarkers for being a one-dimensional variable that is applicable in simple statistical models. In times of machine learning algorithms, the question arises of whether such a simple variable is still useful, or whether high-dimensional models on spatial lesion information are superior.

METHODS

We included 753 first-ever anterior circulation ischemic stroke patients (age 68.4±15.2 years; NIHSS at 24 h 4.4±5.1; modified Rankin Scale (mRS) at 3-months median[IQR] 1[0.75;3]) and traced lesions on diffusion-weighted MRI. In an out-of-sample model validation scheme, we predicted stroke severity as measured by NIHSS 24 h and functional stroke outcome as measured by mRS at 3 months either from spatial lesion features or lesion size.

RESULTS

For stroke severity, the best regression model based on lesion size performed significantly above chance (p < 0.0001) with R2 = 0.322, but models with spatial lesion features performed significantly better with R2 = 0.363 (t(752) = 2.889; p = 0.004). For stroke outcome, the best classification model based on lesion size again performed significantly above chance (p < 0.0001) with an accuracy of 62.8%, which was not different from the best model with spatial lesion features (62.6%, p = 0.80). With smaller training data sets of only 150 or 50 patients, the performance of high-dimensional models with spatial lesion features decreased up to the point of being equivalent or even inferior to models trained on lesion size. The combination of lesion size and spatial lesion features in one model did not improve predictions.

CONCLUSIONS

Lesion size is a decent biomarker for stroke outcome and severity that is slightly inferior to spatial lesion features but is particularly suited in studies with small samples. When low-dimensional models are desired, lesion size provides a viable proxy biomarker for spatial lesion features, whereas high-precision prediction models in personalised prognostic medicine should operate with high-dimensional spatial imaging features in large samples.

Interest & Impact

Downloads

4 since deposited on 26 Sep 2023
4 in the past 12 months

Citations

5 Citations in Web of Science ®
6 Citations in Scopus

Search

in Google Scholar™

Services

Actions (login required)

Edit item

Actions (login required)

Edit item