NEW GENERATION OF SUPERIOR SINGLE PLATING VS LOW-PROFILE DUAL MINI-FRAGMENT PLATING IN DIAPHYSEAL CLAVICLE FRACTURES. A BIOMECHANICAL COMPARATIVE STUDY.

Pastor, Tatjana; Zderic, Ivan; Berk, Till; Souleiman, Firas; Vögelin, Esther; Beeres, Frank Jp; Gueorguiev, Boyko; Pastor, Torsten (2024). NEW GENERATION OF SUPERIOR SINGLE PLATING VS LOW-PROFILE DUAL MINI-FRAGMENT PLATING IN DIAPHYSEAL CLAVICLE FRACTURES. A BIOMECHANICAL COMPARATIVE STUDY. Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery, 33(2), pp. 409-416. Elsevier 10.1016/j.jse.2023.08.008

[img]
Preview
Text
1-s2.0-S1058274623006687-main.pdf - Accepted Version
Available under License Creative Commons: Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works (CC-BY-NC-ND).

Download (1MB) | Preview

BACKGROUND

Recently, a new generation of superior clavicle plates was developed featuring the variable angle locking technology for enhanced screw positioning and a less prominent and optimized plate-to-bone fit design. On the other hand, mini-fragment plates in dual plating mode have demonstrated promising clinical results. The aim of the current study was to compare the biomechanical competence of single superior plating using the new generation plate versus dual plating using low-profile mini-fragment plates.

METHODS

Sixteen paired human cadaveric clavicles were pairwise assigned to two groups for instrumentation with either a superior 2.7 mm Variable Angle Locking Compression Plate (Group 1), or with one 2.5 mm anterior combined with one 2.0 mm superior matrix mandible plate (Group 2). An unstable clavicle shaft fracture (AO/OTA 15.2C) was simulated by means of a 5mm osteotomy gap. Specimens were cyclically tested to failure under craniocaudal cantilever bending, superimposed with bidirectional torsion around the shaft axis and monitored via motion tracking.

RESULTS

Initial construct stiffness was significantly higher in Group 2 (9.28 ± 4.40 N/mm) compared to Group 1 (3.68 ± 1.08 N/mm), p=0.003. The amplitudes of interfragmentary motions in terms of axial and shear displacement, fracture gap opening and torsion, over the course of 12,500 cycles were significantly higher in Group 1 compared to Group 2, p≤0.038. Cycles to 2mm shear displacement were significantly lower in Group 1 (22792 ± 4346) compared to Group 2 (27437 ± 1877), p=0.047.

CONCLUSION

From a biomechanical perspective, low-profile 2.5/2.0 dual plates can be considered as a useful alternative for diaphyseal clavicle fracture fixation especially in less common unstable fracture configurations. 2.7 single superior variable angle locking plates and can therefore be considered as a useful alternative for diaphyseal clavicle fracture fixation especially in less common unstable fracture configurations.

Item Type:

Journal Article (Original Article)

Division/Institute:

04 Faculty of Medicine > Department of Orthopaedic, Plastic and Hand Surgery (DOPH) > Clinic of Plastic and Hand Surgery
04 Faculty of Medicine > Department of Orthopaedic, Plastic and Hand Surgery (DOPH) > Clinic of Plastic and Hand Surgery > Hand Surgery

UniBE Contributor:

Pastor, Tatjana, Vögelin, Esther

Subjects:

600 Technology > 610 Medicine & health

ISSN:

1058-2746

Publisher:

Elsevier

Language:

English

Submitter:

Pubmed Import

Date Deposited:

26 Sep 2023 13:46

Last Modified:

24 Sep 2024 00:25

Publisher DOI:

10.1016/j.jse.2023.08.008

PubMed ID:

37748530

Uncontrolled Keywords:

biomechanics dual plating implant removal midshaft/diaphyseal clavicle fracture mini-fragment plates motion tracking symptomatic implants

BORIS DOI:

10.48350/186602

URI:

https://boris.unibe.ch/id/eprint/186602

Actions (login required)

Edit item Edit item
Provide Feedback