Perioperative pain management models in four European countries: A narrative review of differences, similarities and future directions.

van den Heuvel, Sandra A; van Boekel, Regina L; Cox, Felicia J; Ferré, Fabrice; Minville, Vincent; Stamer, Ulrike M; Vissers, Kris C; Pogatzki-Zahn, Esther M (2024). Perioperative pain management models in four European countries: A narrative review of differences, similarities and future directions. European journal of anaesthesiology, 41(3), pp. 188-198. Wolters Kluwer 10.1097/EJA.0000000000001919

[img] Text
perioperative_pain_management_models_in_four.136.pdf - Published Version
Restricted to registered users only
Available under License Publisher holds Copyright.

Download (1MB) | Request a copy

There is general agreement that acute pain management is an important component of perioperative medicine. However, there is no consensus on the best model of care for perioperative pain management, mainly because evidence is missing in many aspects. Comparing the similarities and differences between countries might reveal some insights into different organisational models and how they work. Here, we performed a narrative review to describe and compare the structures, processes and outcomes of perioperative pain management in the healthcare systems of four European countries using Donabedian's framework as a guide. Our comparison revealed many similarities, differences and gaps. Different structures of acute pain services in the four countries with no common definition and standards of care were found. Protocols have been implemented in all countries and guidelines in some. If outcome is assessed, it is mainly pain intensity, and many patients experiencing more intense pain than others have common risk factors (e.g. preoperative pain, preoperative opioid intake, female sex and young age). Outcome assessment beyond pain intensity (such as pain-related physical function, which is important for early rehabilitation and recovery) is currently not well implemented. Developing common quality indicators, a European guideline for perioperative pain management (e.g. for patients at high risk for experiencing severe pain and other outcome parameters) and common criteria for acute pain services might pave the way forward for improving acute pain management in Europe. Finally, the education of general and specialist staff should be aligned in Europe, for example, by using the curricula of European Pain Federation (EFIC).

Item Type:

Journal Article (Original Article)

Division/Institute:

04 Faculty of Medicine > Department of Intensive Care, Emergency Medicine and Anaesthesiology (DINA) > Clinic and Policlinic for Anaesthesiology and Pain Therapy

UniBE Contributor:

Stamer, Ulrike

Subjects:

600 Technology > 610 Medicine & health

ISSN:

1365-2346

Publisher:

Wolters Kluwer

Language:

English

Submitter:

Pubmed Import

Date Deposited:

30 Oct 2023 09:09

Last Modified:

02 Feb 2024 00:13

Publisher DOI:

10.1097/EJA.0000000000001919

PubMed ID:

37889549

BORIS DOI:

10.48350/188250

URI:

https://boris.unibe.ch/id/eprint/188250

Actions (login required)

Edit item Edit item
Provide Feedback