Empirical research on Polycentric Governance: Critical gaps and a framework for studying long-term change

Baldwin, Elizabeth; Thiel, Andreas; McGinnis, Michael; Kellner, Elke (2023). Empirical research on Polycentric Governance: Critical gaps and a framework for studying long-term change. Policy studies journal, pp. 1-30. Wiley 10.1111/psj.12518

[img]
Preview
Text
Policy_Studies_Journal_-_2023_-_Baldwin_-_Empirical_research_on_polycentric_governance__Critical_gaps_and_a_framework_for.pdf - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons: Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works (CC-BY-NC-ND).

Download (3MB) | Preview
[img]
Preview
Text
Baldwinetal._PGframework_preprint.pdf - Submitted Version
Available under License Publisher holds Copyright.

Download (1MB) | Preview

Polycentric governance (PG) describes governance systems characterized by multiple, interdependent centers of decision making, offering an alternative to centralized governance models. PG is often assumed to be effective at helping policy actors address complex collective action problems, but a burgeoning empirical literature on PG shows that it is not a panacea – PG is associated with both positive and negative governance outcomes. In this article, we ask: what do we know about why PG performs well in some cases but not in others? We start with a systematic review, synthesizing findings that provide empirical support for positive and negative features that are theorized to accompany PG. Our review reveals a critical gap in relation to our understanding of polycentric governance: the existing empirical literature largely fails to address change and evolution over time in PG systems, undermining our understanding of why PG works – or does not– across different contexts and over time. To fill this gap, we propose a “Context – Operations – Outcomes – Feedbacks” (COOF) framework that draws explicit attention to the interplay between context, operational arrangements, outcomes, and identifies feedback pathways and adjustment mechanisms that drive dynamic change and evolution over time.

Item Type:

Journal Article (Review Article)

UniBE Contributor:

Kellner, Elke

Subjects:

300 Social sciences, sociology & anthropology > 320 Political science

ISSN:

1541-0072

Publisher:

Wiley

Language:

English

Submitter:

Elke Kellner

Date Deposited:

30 Oct 2023 08:06

Last Modified:

23 Apr 2024 16:19

Publisher DOI:

10.1111/psj.12518

BORIS DOI:

10.48350/188294

URI:

https://boris.unibe.ch/id/eprint/188294

Actions (login required)

Edit item Edit item
Provide Feedback