Editor's Choice - The VASCUNExplanT Project: An International Study Assessing Open Surgical Conversion of Failed Non-Infected Endovascular Aortic Aneurysm Repair.

Lopez Espada, Cristina; Behrendt, Christian-Alexander; Mani, Kevin; D'Oria, Mario; Lattman, Thomas; Khashram, Manar; Altreuther, Martin; Cohnert, Tina U; Pherwani, Arun; Budtz-Lilly, Jacob (2023). Editor's Choice - The VASCUNExplanT Project: An International Study Assessing Open Surgical Conversion of Failed Non-Infected Endovascular Aortic Aneurysm Repair. European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery, 66(5), pp. 653-660. Elsevier 10.1016/j.ejvs.2023.07.029

[img] Text
1-s2.0-S1078588423005968-main.pdf - Published Version
Restricted to registered users only
Available under License Publisher holds Copyright.

Download (1MB) | Request a copy

OBJECTIVE

The need for open surgical conversion (OSC) after failed endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR) persists, despite expanding endovascular options for secondary intervention. The VASCUNExplanT project collected international data to identify risk factors for failed EVAR, as well as OSC outcomes. This retrospective cross sectional study analysed data after OSC for failed EVAR from the VASCUNET international collaboration.

METHODS

VASCUNET queried registries from its 28 member countries, and 17 collaborated with data from patients who underwent OSC (2005 - 2020). Any OSC for infection was excluded. Data included demographics, EVAR, and OSC procedural details, as well as post-operative mortality and complication rates.

RESULTS

There were 348 OSC patients from 17 centres, of whom 33 (9.4%) were women. There were 130 (37.4%) devices originally deployed outside of instructions for use. The most common indication for OSC was endoleak (n = 143, 41.1%); ruptures accounted for 17.2% of cases. The median time from EVAR to OSC was 48.6 months [IQR 29.7, 71.6]; median abdominal aortic aneurysm diameter at OSC was 70.5 mm [IQR 61, 82]. A total of 160 (45.6%) patients underwent one or more re-interventions prior to OSC, while 63 patients (18.1%) underwent more than one re-intervention (range 1 - 5). Overall, the 30 day mortality rate post-OSC was 11.8% (n = 41), 11.1% for men and 18.2% for women (p = .23). The 30 day mortality rate was 6.1% for elective cases, and 28.3% for ruptures (p < .0001). The predicted 90 day survival for the entire cohort was 88.3% (95% CI 84.3 - 91.3). Multivariable analysis revealed rupture (OR 4.23; 95% CI 2.05 - 8.75; p < .0001) and total graft explantation (OR 2.10; 95% CI 1.02 - 4.34; p = .04) as the only statistically significant predictive factors for 30 day death.

CONCLUSION

This multicentre analysis of patients who underwent OSC shows that, despite varying case mix and operative techniques, OSC is feasible but associated with significant morbidity and mortality rates, particularly when performed for rupture.

Item Type:

Journal Article (Original Article)

Division/Institute:

04 Faculty of Medicine > Department of Cardiovascular Disorders (DHGE) > Clinic of Heart Surgery

Subjects:

600 Technology > 610 Medicine & health

ISSN:

1532-2165

Publisher:

Elsevier

Language:

English

Submitter:

Felix Loeper

Date Deposited:

14 Feb 2024 08:38

Last Modified:

27 Feb 2024 14:27

Publisher DOI:

10.1016/j.ejvs.2023.07.029

PubMed ID:

37490979

Additional Information:

Daniel Becker (Affiliation UK Gefässchirurgie Inselspital) hat in der VASCUNExplant Collaborator Group mit gearbeitet.

Uncontrolled Keywords:

Abdominal Aortic aneurysm Conversion to open surgery Device removal Endovascular aneurysm repair Prosthesis failure

BORIS DOI:

10.48350/190185

URI:

https://boris.unibe.ch/id/eprint/190185

Actions (login required)

Edit item Edit item
Provide Feedback