Kebede, Samuel; Brazier, Ellen; Freeman, Aimee M; Muwonge, Timothy R; Choi, Jun Yong; de Waal, Renee; Poda, Armel; Cesar, Carina; Munyaneza, Athanase; Kasozi, Charles; Pasayan, Mark Kristoffer U; Althoff, Keri N; Shongo, Alisho; Low, Nicola; Ekouevi, Didier; Veloso, Valdiléa G; Ross, Jonathan (2024). Preexposure prophylaxis availability among health facilities participating in the global International epidemiology Databases to Evaluate AIDS (IeDEA) consortium. AIDS, 38(5), pp. 751-756. Wolters Kluwer Health 10.1097/QAD.0000000000003824
Text
Kebede_AIDS_2023_AAM.pdf - Accepted Version Restricted to registered users only until 23 December 2024. Available under License Publisher holds Copyright. Download (854kB) |
|
Text
Kebede_AIDS_2024.pdf - Published Version Restricted to registered users only Available under License Publisher holds Copyright. Download (805kB) |
BACKGROUND
While recognized as a key HIV prevention strategy, preexposure prophylaxis (PrEP) availability and accessibility are not well documented globally. We aimed to describe PrEP drug registration status and the availability of PrEP services across HIV care sites participating in the International epidemiology Databases to Evaluate AIDS (IeDEA) research consortium.
METHODS
We used country-level PrEP drug registration status from the AIDS Vaccine Advocacy Coalition and data from IeDEA surveys conducted in 2014, 2017 and 2020 among participating HIV clinics in seven global regions. We used descriptive statistics to assess PrEP availability across IeDEA sites serving adult patients in 2020 and examined trends in PrEP availability among sites that responded to all three surveys.
RESULTS
Of 199 sites that completed the 2020 survey, PrEP was available in 161 (81%). PrEP availability was highest at sites in North America (29/30; 97%) and East Africa (70/74; 95%) and lowest at sites in Central (10/20; 50%) and West Africa (1/6; 17%). PrEP availability was higher among sites in countries where PrEP was officially registered (146/161; 91%) than where it was not (14/32; 44%). Availability was higher at health centers (109/120; 90%) and district hospitals (14/16; 88%) compared to regional/teaching hospitals (36/63). Among the 94 sites that responded to all three surveys, PrEP availability increased from 47% in 2014 to 60% in 2017 and 76% in 2020.
CONCLUSION
PrEP availability has substantially increased since 2014 and is now available at most IeDEA sites. However, PrEP service provision varies markedly across global regions.
Item Type: |
Journal Article (Original Article) |
---|---|
Division/Institute: |
04 Faculty of Medicine > Pre-clinic Human Medicine > Institute of Social and Preventive Medicine (ISPM) |
UniBE Contributor: |
Low, Nicola |
Subjects: |
600 Technology > 610 Medicine & health 300 Social sciences, sociology & anthropology > 360 Social problems & social services |
ISSN: |
1473-5571 |
Publisher: |
Wolters Kluwer Health |
Funders: |
[215] National Institute of Health (NIH) |
Language: |
English |
Submitter: |
Doris Kopp Heim |
Date Deposited: |
05 Jan 2024 15:51 |
Last Modified: |
10 Apr 2024 13:57 |
Publisher DOI: |
10.1097/QAD.0000000000003824 |
PubMed ID: |
38133656 |
BORIS DOI: |
10.48350/191305 |
URI: |
https://boris.unibe.ch/id/eprint/191305 |