Accuracy of B-type natriuretic peptide tests to exclude congestive heart failure: systematic review of test accuracy studies

Battaglia, Markus; Pewsner, Daniel; Jüni, Peter; Egger, Matthias; Bucher, Heiner C; Bachmann, Lucas M (2006). Accuracy of B-type natriuretic peptide tests to exclude congestive heart failure: systematic review of test accuracy studies. Archives of internal medicine, 166(10), pp. 1073-80. Chicago, Ill.: American Medical Association 10.1001/archinte.166.10.1073

Full text not available from this repository. (Request a copy)

BACKGROUND: Congestive heart failure (CHF) is a major public health problem. The use of B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) tests shows promising diagnostic accuracy. Herein, we summarize the evidence on the accuracy of BNP tests in the diagnosis of CHF and compare the performance of rapid enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and standard radioimmunosorbent assay (RIA) tests. METHODS: We searched electronic databases and the reference lists of included studies, and we contacted experts. Data were extracted on the study population, the type of test used, and methods. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) plots and summary ROC curves were produced and negative likelihood ratios pooled. Random-effect meta-analysis and metaregression were used to combine data and explore sources of between-study heterogeneity. RESULTS: Nineteen studies describing 22 patient populations (9 ELISA and 13 RIA) and 9093 patients were included. The diagnosis of CHF was verified by echocardiography, radionuclide scan, or echocardiography combined with clinical criteria. The pooled negative likelihood ratio overall from random-effect meta-analysis was 0.18 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.13-0.23). It was lower for the ELISA test (0.12; 95% CI, 0.09-0.16) than for the RIA test (0.23; 95% CI, 0.16-0.32). For a pretest probability of 20%, which is typical for patients with suspected CHF in primary care, a negative result of the ELISA test would produce a posttest probability of 2.9%; a negative RIA test, a posttest probability of 5.4%. CONCLUSIONS: The use of BNP tests to rule out CHF in primary care settings could reduce demand for echocardiography. The advantages of rapid ELISA tests need to be balanced against their higher cost.

Item Type:

Journal Article (Original Article)

Division/Institute:

04 Faculty of Medicine > Pre-clinic Human Medicine > Institute of Social and Preventive Medicine

UniBE Contributor:

Battaglia, Markus; Pewsner, Daniel Maurice; Jüni, Peter; Egger, Matthias and Bachmann, Lucas

ISSN:

0003-9926

ISBN:

16717169

Publisher:

American Medical Association

Language:

English

Submitter:

Factscience Import

Date Deposited:

04 Oct 2013 14:46

Last Modified:

06 Dec 2013 13:42

Publisher DOI:

10.1001/archinte.166.10.1073

PubMed ID:

16717169

Web of Science ID:

000237720500006

URI:

https://boris.unibe.ch/id/eprint/19151 (FactScience: 1552)

Actions (login required)

Edit item Edit item
Provide Feedback