Outcomes of patients with Wilms' tumour stage III due to positive resection margins only: An analysis of patients treated on the SIOP-WT-2001 protocol in the UK-CCLG and GPOH studies.

Vujanić, Gordan M; Graf, Norbert; D'Hooghe, Ellen; Chowdhury, Tanzina; Vokuhl, Christian; Al-Saadi, Reem; Pritchard-Jones, Kathy; Melchior, Patrick; Furtwängler, Rhoikos (2023). Outcomes of patients with Wilms' tumour stage III due to positive resection margins only: An analysis of patients treated on the SIOP-WT-2001 protocol in the UK-CCLG and GPOH studies. International journal of cancer, 152(8), pp. 1640-1647. Wiley 10.1002/ijc.34371

[img]
Preview
Text
Intl_Journal_of_Cancer_-_2022_-_Vujani__-_Outcomes_of_patients_with_Wilms__tumour_stage_III_due_to_positive_resection.pdf - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons: Attribution (CC-BY).

Download (3MB) | Preview

Stage III Wilms' tumour (WT) represents a heterogeneous group which includes different criteria, but all stage III patients are treated according to the same study regiment. The aim of the study was to retrospectively analyse outcomes in patients with stage III due to positive resection margins (RM) only, sub-grouped in RM with viable (RM-v) and nonviable (RM-nv) tumour. Patients were treated pre- and postoperatively according to the SIOP-WT-2001 protocol in the UK-CCLG and GPOH WT trials and studies (2001-2020). There were 197 patients, including 134 with localised, abdominal stage III and 63 with overall stage IV, but abdominal stage III. Stage III due to RM-v had 126 patients, and due to RM-nv 71 patients. The overall 5-year local-relapse-free survival (RFS), event-free (EFS) and overall survival (OS) estimates for all patients with abdominal stage III RM were 95.7% (±SE1.5%), 85.1 (±SE2.6%) and 90.3% (±SE2.2%), respectively. Patients with stage III RM-nv had significantly better RFS and EFS than patients with RM-v (P = .027 and P = .003, respectively). A multivariate analysis showed that RM-v remained a significant factor for EFS when adjusted for age, presence of metastasis at diagnosis, histological risk group and overall stage in Cox regression analysis (P = .006). Patients with stage III due to RM-nv only exhibited no local recurrence and have a significantly better RFS and EFS than patients with RM-v. The results suggest that exclusion of RM-nv as a stage III criterion in the UMBRELLA staging system and consequent treatment reduction is warranted.

Item Type:

Journal Article (Original Article)

Division/Institute:

04 Faculty of Medicine > Department of Gynaecology, Paediatrics and Endocrinology (DFKE) > Clinic of Paediatric Medicine
04 Faculty of Medicine > Department of Gynaecology, Paediatrics and Endocrinology (DFKE) > Clinic of Paediatric Medicine > Paediatric Haematology/Oncology

UniBE Contributor:

Furtwängler, Rhoikos

Subjects:

600 Technology > 610 Medicine & health

ISSN:

1097-0215

Publisher:

Wiley

Language:

English

Submitter:

Anette van Dorland

Date Deposited:

25 Jan 2024 07:14

Last Modified:

25 Jan 2024 07:14

Publisher DOI:

10.1002/ijc.34371

PubMed ID:

36444500

Uncontrolled Keywords:

Wilms' tumour outcomes resection margins stage III criteria

BORIS DOI:

10.48350/192106

URI:

https://boris.unibe.ch/id/eprint/192106

Actions (login required)

Edit item Edit item
Provide Feedback