Automatic lung segmentation of magnetic resonance images: A new approach applied to healthy volunteers undergoing enhanced Deep-Inspiration-Breath-Hold for motion-mitigated 4D proton therapy of lung tumors.

Missimer, John H; Emert, Frank; Lomax, Antony J; Weber, D C (2024). Automatic lung segmentation of magnetic resonance images: A new approach applied to healthy volunteers undergoing enhanced Deep-Inspiration-Breath-Hold for motion-mitigated 4D proton therapy of lung tumors. Physics and imaging in radiation oncology, 29(100531) Elsevier 10.1016/j.phro.2024.100531

Preview

Text 1-s2.0-S2405631624000010-main.pdf - Published Version Available under License Creative Commons: Attribution (CC-BY). Download (2MB) | Preview

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Respiratory suppression techniques represent an effective motion mitigation strategy for 4D-irradiation of lung tumors with protons. A magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based study applied and analyzed methods for this purpose, including enhanced Deep-Inspiration-Breath-Hold (eDIBH). Twenty-one healthy volunteers (41-58 years) underwent thoracic MR scans in four imaging sessions containing two eDIBH-guided MRIs per session to simulate motion-dependent irradiation conditions. The automated MRI segmentation algorithm presented here was critical in determining the lung volumes (LVs) achieved during eDIBH.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The study included 168 MRIs acquired under eDIBH conditions. The lung segmentation algorithm consisted of four analysis steps: (i) image preprocessing, (ii) MRI histogram analysis with thresholding, (iii) automatic segmentation, (iv) 3D-clustering. To validate the algorithm, 46 eDIBH-MRIs were manually contoured. Sørensen-Dice similarity coefficients (DSCs) and relative deviations of LVs were determined as similarity measures. Assessment of intrasessional and intersessional LV variations and their differences provided estimates of statistical and systematic errors.

RESULTS

Lung segmentation time for 100 2D-MRI planes was ∼ 10 s. Compared to manual lung contouring, the median DSC was 0.94 with a lower 95 % confidence level (CL) of 0.92. The relative volume deviations yielded a median value of 0.059 and 95 % CLs of -0.013 and 0.13. Artifact-based volume errors, mainly of the trachea, were estimated. Estimated statistical and systematic errors ranged between 6 and 8 %.

CONCLUSIONS

The presented analytical algorithm is fast, precise, and readily available. The results are comparable to time-consuming, manual segmentations and other automatic segmentation approaches. Post-processing to remove image artifacts is under development.

Interest & Impact

Downloads

0 since deposited on 01 Feb 2024
0 in the past 12 months

Citations

5 Citations in Web of Science ®
6 Citations in Scopus

Search

in Google Scholar™

Services

Actions (login required)

Edit item

Actions (login required)

Edit item