Validation of the AO Spine CROST (Clinician Reported Outcome Spine Trauma) in the clinical setting.

Sadiqi, Said; de Gendt, Erin E A; Muijs, Sander P J; Post, Marcel W M; Benneker, Lorin M; Holas, Martin; Tee, Jin W; Albers, Christoph E.; Häckel, Sonja; Svac, Juraj; Bransford, Richard J; El-Sharkawi, Mohammad M; Kandziora, Frank; Rajasekaran, Shanmuganathan; Schnake, Klaus J; Vaccaro, Alexander R; Oner, F Cumhur (2024). Validation of the AO Spine CROST (Clinician Reported Outcome Spine Trauma) in the clinical setting. European spine journal, 33(4), pp. 1607-1616. Springer 10.1007/s00586-024-08145-5

Preview

Text s00586-024-08145-5.pdf - Published Version Available under License Creative Commons: Attribution (CC-BY). Download (811kB) | Preview

PURPOSE

To evaluate feasibility, internal consistency, inter-rater reliability, and prospective validity of AO Spine CROST (Clinician Reported Outcome Spine Trauma) in the clinical setting.

METHODS

Patients were included from four trauma centers. Two surgeons with substantial amount of experience in spine trauma care were included from each center. Two separate questionnaires were administered at baseline, 6-months and 1-year: one to surgeons (mainly CROST) and another to patients (AO Spine PROST-Patient Reported Outcome Spine Trauma). Descriptive statistics were used to analyze patient characteristics and feasibility, Cronbach's α for internal consistency. Inter-rater reliability through exact agreement, Kappa statistics and Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC). Prospective analysis, and relationships between CROST and PROST were explored through descriptive statistics and Spearman correlations.

RESULTS

In total, 92 patients were included. CROST showed excellent feasibility results. Internal consistency (α = 0.58-0.70) and reliability (ICC = 0.52 and 0.55) were moderate. Mean total scores between surgeons only differed 0.2-0.9 with exact agreement 48.9-57.6%. Exact agreement per CROST item showed good results (73.9-98.9%). Kappa statistics revealed moderate agreement for most CROST items. In the prospective analysis a trend was only seen when no concerns at all were expressed by the surgeon (CROST = 0), and moderate to strong positive Spearman correlations were found between CROST at baseline and the scores at follow-up (rs = 0.41-0.64). Comparing the CROST with PROST showed no specific association, nor any Spearman correlations (rs = -0.33-0.07).

CONCLUSIONS

The AO Spine CROST showed moderate validity in a true clinical setting including patients from the daily clinical practice.

Interest & Impact

Downloads

3 since deposited on 19 Feb 2024
3 in the past 12 months

Citations

5 Citations in Web of Science ®
6 Citations in Scopus

Search

in Google Scholar™

Services

Actions (login required)

Edit item

Actions (login required)

Edit item