Metzner, Andreas; Fiala, Martin; Vijgen, Johan; Ouss, Alexandre; Gunawardene, Melanie; Hansen, Jim; Kautzner, Josef; Schmidt, Boris; Duytschaever, Mattias; Reichlin, Tobias; Blaauw, Yuri; Sommer, Philipp; Vanderper, Annelies; Achyutha, Anitha B; Johnson, Madeline; Raybuck, Jonathan D; Neuzil, Petr (2024). Long-term outcomes of the pentaspline pulsed field ablation catheter for the treatment of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: Results of the prospective, multicenter FARA-Freedom Study. Europace, 26(3) Oxford University Press 10.1093/europace/euae053
|
Text
euae053.pdf - Accepted Version Available under License Creative Commons: Attribution (CC-BY). Download (734kB) | Preview |
INTRODUCTION/OBJECTIVES
Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) is well-established strategy for the treatment of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF). Despite randomized controlled trials and real-world data showing the promise of pulsed-field ablation (PFA) for this treatment, long term efficacy and safety data demonstrating single procedure outcomes off antiarrhythmic drugs remain limited. The aim of the FARA-Freedom Study was to evaluate long-term efficacy and safety of PFA using the pentaspline catheter for PAF.
METHODS
FARA-Freedom, a prospective, non-randomized, multicenter study, enrolled patients with PAF undergoing de novo PVI with PFA, which were followed for 12 months with weekly transtelephonic monitoring (TTMs) and 72-hr Holter ECG at 6 and 12 months. The primary safety endpoint was a composite of device- or procedure-related serious adverse events out to 7 days post-ablation and PV stenosis or atrioesophageal (AE) fistula out to 12 months. Treatment success is a composite of acute PVI and chronic success; which includes freedom from any documented atrial tachyarrhythmia longer than 30 s, use of antiarrhythmic drugs or cardioversion after a 3-month blanking period, or use of amiodarone or repeat ablation at any time.
RESULTS
The study enrolled 179 PAF patients (62 ± 10 yr, 39% female) at 13 centers. At index procedure, all PVs were successfully isolated with the pentaspline PFA catheter. Procedure and left atrial dwell times, with a 20 min waiting period, were 71.9 ± 17.6 and 41.0 ± 13.3 min, respectively. Fluoroscopy time was 11.5 ± 7.4 min. Notably, monitoring compliance was high with 88.4% and 90.3% with weekly event and 72-hour Holter monitors, respectively. Freedom from composite primary effectiveness endpoint was 66.6%, 41 patients had atrial tachyarrhythmia recurrence: mostly recurrent atrial fibrillation (31 patients). The composite safety endpoint occurred in 2 patients (1.1%), 1 tamponade and 1 TIA. There was no coronary spasm, PV stenosis, or AE fistula. There were 4 cases of transient phrenic nerve palsy, but all resolved during index procedure.
CONCLUSIONS
In this prospective, non-randomized, multicenter study, PVI using a pentaspline PFA catheter was effective in treating PAF patients despite rigorous endpoint definitions and high monitoring compliance and demonstrated favorable safety.
Item Type: |
Journal Article (Original Article) |
---|---|
Division/Institute: |
04 Faculty of Medicine > Department of Cardiovascular Disorders (DHGE) > Clinic of Cardiology |
UniBE Contributor: |
Reichlin, Tobias Roman |
Subjects: |
600 Technology > 610 Medicine & health |
ISSN: |
1532-2092 |
Publisher: |
Oxford University Press |
Language: |
English |
Submitter: |
Pubmed Import |
Date Deposited: |
04 Mar 2024 09:42 |
Last Modified: |
14 Mar 2024 00:15 |
Publisher DOI: |
10.1093/europace/euae053 |
PubMed ID: |
38385529 |
BORIS DOI: |
10.48350/193185 |
URI: |
https://boris.unibe.ch/id/eprint/193185 |