Systematic scoping review of automated systems for the surveillance of healthcare-associated bloodstream infections related to intravascular catheters.

Lotfinejad, Nasim; Januel, Jean-Marie; Tschudin-Sutter, Sarah; Schreiber, Peter W; Grandbastien, Bruno; Damonti, Lauro; Lo Priore, Elia; Scherrer, Alexandra; Harbarth, Stephan; Catho, Gaud; Buetti, Niccolò (2024). Systematic scoping review of automated systems for the surveillance of healthcare-associated bloodstream infections related to intravascular catheters. Antimicrobial resistance and infection control, 13(1), p. 25. BioMed Central 10.1186/s13756-024-01380-x

[img]
Preview
Text
s13756-024-01380-x.pdf - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons: Attribution (CC-BY).

Download (1MB) | Preview

INTRODUCTION

Intravascular catheters are crucial devices in medical practice that increase the risk of healthcare-associated infections (HAIs), and related health-economic adverse outcomes. This scoping review aims to provide a comprehensive overview of published automated algorithms for surveillance of catheter-related bloodstream infections (CRBSI) and central line-associated bloodstream infections (CLABSI).

METHODS

We performed a scoping review based on a systematic search of the literature in PubMed and EMBASE from 1 January 2000 to 31 December 2021. Studies were included if they evaluated predictive performance of automated surveillance algorithms for CLABSI/CRBSI detection and used manually collected surveillance data as reference. We assessed the design of the automated systems, including the definitions used to develop algorithms (CLABSI versus CRBSI), the datasets and denominators used, and the algorithms evaluated in each of the studies.

RESULTS

We screened 586 studies based on title and abstract, and 99 were assessed based on full text. Nine studies were included in the scoping review. Most studies were monocentric (n = 5), and they identified CLABSI (n = 7) as an outcome. The majority of the studies used administrative and microbiological data (n = 9) and five studies included the presence of a vascular central line in their automated system. Six studies explained the denominator they selected, five of which chose central line-days. The most common rules and steps used in the algorithms were categorized as hospital-acquired rules, infection rules (infection versus contamination), deduplication, episode grouping, secondary BSI rules (secondary versus primary BSI), and catheter-associated rules.

CONCLUSION

The automated surveillance systems that we identified were heterogeneous in terms of definitions, datasets and denominators used, with a combination of rules in each algorithm. Further guidelines and studies are needed to develop and implement algorithms to detect CLABSI/CRBSI, with standardized definitions, appropriate data sources and suitable denominators.

Item Type:

Journal Article (Review Article)

Division/Institute:

04 Faculty of Medicine > Department of Haematology, Oncology, Infectious Diseases, Laboratory Medicine and Hospital Pharmacy (DOLS) > Clinic of Infectiology

UniBE Contributor:

Damonti, Lauro (B)

Subjects:

600 Technology > 610 Medicine & health

ISSN:

2047-2994

Publisher:

BioMed Central

Language:

English

Submitter:

Pubmed Import

Date Deposited:

05 Mar 2024 09:24

Last Modified:

05 Mar 2024 09:33

Publisher DOI:

10.1186/s13756-024-01380-x

PubMed ID:

38419046

Uncontrolled Keywords:

Algorithm Automated monitoring Automation CLABSI CRBSI Healthcare associated infections Surveillance

BORIS DOI:

10.48350/193612

URI:

https://boris.unibe.ch/id/eprint/193612

Actions (login required)

Edit item Edit item
Provide Feedback