Do Infectious Diseases After Kidney Retransplantation Differ From Those After First Kidney Transplantation?

Kusejko, Katharina; Neofytos, Dionysios; van Delden, Christian; Hirsch, Hans H; Meylan, Pascal; Boggian, Katia; Hirzel, Cedric; Garzoni, Christian; Sidler, Daniel; Schnyder, Aurelia; Schaub, Stefan; Golshayan, Déla; Haidar, Fadi; Bonani, Marco; Kouyos, Roger D; Mueller, Nicolas J; Schreiber, Peter W (2024). Do Infectious Diseases After Kidney Retransplantation Differ From Those After First Kidney Transplantation? Open Forum Infectious Diseases, 11(3) Oxford University Press 10.1093/ofid/ofae055

[img]
Preview
Text
ofae055.pdf - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons: Attribution (CC-BY).

Download (1MB) | Preview

BACKGROUND

Infectious diseases (IDs) are highly relevant after solid organ transplantation in terms of morbidity and mortality, being among the most common causes of death. Patients undergoing kidney retransplantation (re-K-Tx) have been already receiving immunosuppressive therapy over a prolonged period, potentially facilitating subsequent infections. Comparing ID events after re-K-Tx and first kidney transplantation (f-K-Tx) can delineate patterns and risks of ID events associated with prolonged immunosuppression.

METHODS

We included adult patients with records on f-K-Tx and re-K-Tx in the Swiss Transplant Cohort Study. We analyzed ID events after f-K-Tx and re-K-Tx within the same patients and compared infection rates, causative pathogens, and infection sites. Recurrent time-to-event analyses were performed for comparison of infection rates.

RESULTS

A total of 59 patients with a median age of 47 years (range, 18-73) were included. Overall, 312 ID events in 52 patients occurred. In multivariable recurrent event modeling, the rate of ID events was significantly lower after re-K-Tx (hazard ratio, 0.70; P = .02). More bacterial (68.9% vs 60.4%) and fungal (4.0% vs 1.1%) infections were observed after f-K-Tx but fewer viral infections (27.0% vs 38.5%) as compared with re-K-Tx (P = .11). After f-K-Tx, urinary and gastrointestinal tract infections were more frequent; after re-K-Tx, respiratory tract and surgical site infections were more frequent (P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

ID events were less frequent after re-K-Tx. Affected sites differed significantly after f-K-Tx vs re-K-Tx.

Item Type:

Journal Article (Original Article)

Division/Institute:

04 Faculty of Medicine > Department of Dermatology, Urology, Rheumatology, Nephrology, Osteoporosis (DURN) > Clinic of Nephrology and Hypertension
04 Faculty of Medicine > Department of Haematology, Oncology, Infectious Diseases, Laboratory Medicine and Hospital Pharmacy (DOLS) > Clinic of Infectiology

UniBE Contributor:

Hirzel, Cédric, Garzoni, Christian, Sidler, Daniel (A)

Subjects:

600 Technology > 610 Medicine & health

ISSN:

2328-8957

Publisher:

Oxford University Press

Language:

English

Submitter:

Pubmed Import

Date Deposited:

13 Mar 2024 11:14

Last Modified:

04 Apr 2024 14:13

Publisher DOI:

10.1093/ofid/ofae055

PubMed ID:

38464489

Uncontrolled Keywords:

infections kidney retransplantation organ allocation

BORIS DOI:

10.48350/194117

URI:

https://boris.unibe.ch/id/eprint/194117

Actions (login required)

Edit item Edit item
Provide Feedback