Trimalchio’s Superstitions: Traditional Customs or Their Distortion? I

Keier, Denis (2023). Trimalchio’s Superstitions: Traditional Customs or Their Distortion? I. Hyperboreus, 29(2), pp. 241-264. Bibliotheca Classica Petropolitana 10.25990/hyperboreus.bcge-vy33

Text hyp_29_2_04_Keyer.pdf - Published Version Restricted to registered users only Available under License Publisher holds Copyright. Download (646kB) | Request a copy

The author objects to H. Petersmann’s view that Trimalchio’s superstitious practice distorts common Roman customs and betrays his ignorance. The first half of the paper discusses two passages (Petr. 32. 3–4; 30. 5–6). (1) Petersmann erroneously states that Romans did not wear rings on their ring fingers and, relying on Plin. NH 28. 24, claims that Romans took off their rings during a meal. Yet, there is direct evidence for the opposite (Ov. Am. 1. 4. 26; Macr. Sat. 7. 13. 6), and for several reasons Pliny’s words "nam si mensa adsit" are likely to have been corrupt or misinterpreted. (2) Relying on Vitruv. 3. 4. 4 (on entering temples), Petersmann presumes that entering with the right foot forward was confined to sacred places, sothat the prescript to enter Trimalchio’s triclinium “dextro pede” renders divine
honors to his house. Yet, passages like Ov. Ibis 101 with schol.; Apul. Met. 6. 26;
Amm. Marc. 26. 6. 18 make it likely that not only temples, but also private houses
were to be entered with the right foot forward.

Interest & Impact

Downloads

0 since deposited on 02 Apr 2024
0 in the past 12 months

Citations

5 Citations in Web of Science ®
6 Citations in Scopus

Search

in Google Scholar™

Services

Actions (login required)

Edit item

Actions (login required)

Edit item