Egg, Matthias; Hämmerli, August (2023). Running Mice and Successful Theories: The Limitations of a Classical Analogy. Journal for General Philosophy of Science Springer 10.1007/s10838-023-09664-3
|
Text
Egg_Haemmerli_2023_Running_Mice.pdf - Published Version Available under License Creative Commons: Attribution (CC-BY). Download (845kB) | Preview |
Bas van Fraassen’s Darwinian explanation for the success of science has sparked four decades of discussion, with scientific realists and antirealists alike using biologically inspired reasoning to support their points of view. Based on critical engagement with van Fraassen’s proposal itself and later contributions by Stathis Psillos and K. Brad Wray, we claim that central arguments on both sides of this controversy suffer from an insufficient understanding of Darwinism and its underlying biological concepts. Adding the necessary biological background turns out to subvert the argumentative force of viewing the success of scientific theories as analogous to the behaviour of biotic entities. In conclusion, we sketch more productive ways of viewing the relationship between biology and scientific
realism.
Item Type: |
Journal Article (Original Article) |
|---|---|
Division/Institute: |
06 Faculty of Humanities > Department of Art and Cultural Studies > Institute of Philosophy 06 Faculty of Humanities > Department of Art and Cultural Studies > Institute of Philosophy > Theoretical Philosophy |
UniBE Contributor: |
Egg, Matthias |
Subjects: |
100 Philosophy 500 Science > 570 Life sciences; biology |
ISSN: |
0925-4560 |
Publisher: |
Springer |
Language: |
English |
Submitter: |
Matthias Peter Egg |
Date Deposited: |
09 Apr 2024 10:09 |
Last Modified: |
09 Apr 2024 10:09 |
Publisher DOI: |
10.1007/s10838-023-09664-3 |
BORIS DOI: |
10.48350/195183 |
URI: |
https://boris.unibe.ch/id/eprint/195183 |
Actions (login required)
 |
Edit item |