The relative effectiveness of different grassland restoration methods: A systematic literature search and meta-analysis

Slodowicz, Daniel; Durbecq, Aure; Ladouceur, Emma; Eschen, René; Humbert, Jean-Yves; Arlettaz, Raphaël (2023). The relative effectiveness of different grassland restoration methods: A systematic literature search and meta-analysis. Ecological solutions and evidence, 4(2) Wiley 10.1002/2688-8319.12221

Preview

Text Slodowicz_EcoSolEvi2023.pdf - Published Version Available under License Creative Commons: Attribution (CC-BY). Download (1MB) | Preview

1. Active grassland restoration has gained importance in mitigating the dramatic decline of farmnland biodiversity. While there is evidence that such operations are generally effective in promoting plant diversity, little is known about the effectiveness of the different methods applied. Restoration methods can differ in intensity of seed bed preparation, seed source and method of seed application.
2. In this systematic literature search and meta-analysis, we screened the literature for studies of the restoration of mesic grasslands in temperate Europe. We focused on active restoration experiments that included a treatment and lasted for more than 3 years. We evaluated the influence of restoration factors on plant species richness relative to non-restored controls.
3. We found 187 articles that investigated the outcome of operations aimed at actively restoring mesic temperate grasslands. Most articles focused on plants, with only 9.6% dealing with other organisms (e.g. beetles, pollinating insects). Many papers had to be excluded due to incomplete data, too short study duration and/or lack of an adequate control. This resulted in 13 articles fulfilling our criteria for inclusion, yielding a total of 56 data points for the meta-analysis.
4. Restoration actions increased plant species richness by, on average, 17.4%, compared to controls. The seed source explained a significant amount of variation in plant species richness: seeds originating from a speciose donor grassland had a positive effect. This effect was even enhanced when combined with a commercial seed mix, whereas commercial seed mixes alone had no significant effect. We did not observe any effect of other factors, such as the type of seed bed preparation or the seed application method.

Interest & Impact

Downloads

3 since deposited on 03 Apr 2024
3 in the past 12 months

Citations

5 Citations in Web of Science ®
6 Citations in Scopus

Search

in Google Scholar™

Services

Actions (login required)

Edit item

Actions (login required)

Edit item