A Core Outcome Set for Intact Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair.

Machin, Matthew; Wanhainen, Anders; D'Oria, Mario; Koelemaij, Mark; Kakkos, Stavros; Grima, Matthew Joe; Powell, Janet T (2024). A Core Outcome Set for Intact Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair. European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery, 68(3), pp. 294-302. Elsevier 10.1016/j.ejvs.2024.04.029

Text 1-s2.0-S1078588424003654-main.pdf - Accepted Version Restricted to registered users only until 25 April 2025. Available under License Publisher holds Copyright. Download (876kB)

OBJECTIVE

Technology and advances in clinical care have changed the management of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) but the clinical effectiveness of continuing advances needs to be assessed. To facilitate rapid synthesis of new evidence and improve stakeholder representation, including patients, the concept of core outcome sets has been developed. Core outcome sets, reflecting the needs of all stakeholders, have been established across several surgical specialties. This study aimed to develop an international core outcome set for intact AAA repair.

METHODS

Following COMET methodology, potential outcomes were identified from a systematic review of published outcomes and focus groups involving patients, carers, and nurses. A 38 question Delphi consensus survey in lay language was developed (with translation to local languages); this included 35 themes identified from the findings of the systematic review and three themes from the focus groups. All three of the themes identified by the focus groups (cognitive, physical, and social functioning) can be evaluated from quality of life instruments, with overall quality of life being identified from the systematic review. The survey was completed by patients, carers or family members, vascular nurses, vascular surgeons, trainees, interventional radiologists, anaesthetists, and industry partners from six European countries. After two rounds of the survey, the top outcomes were discussed at a face to face multistakeholder consensus meeting.

RESULTS

The 38 item questionnaire was amended after piloting among all stakeholder groups. After the first round of the Delphi survey (98 respondents), 15 questions were eliminated and 11 further questions were eliminated after round two (90 respondents). This left two outcome questions for discussion at the consensus meeting, where the top six outcomes were unanimously endorsed: mortality at 30 days (or in hospital if longer), secondary AAA rupture, overall quality of life and retention of cognitive functioning after recovery, 5 year survival, and continued sac growth.

CONCLUSION

Six core outcomes are recommended for use as a minimum framework in all future studies and registries of intact open and endovascular AAA repair. Further work to select instruments for quality of life and define instruments for cognitive functioning is needed.

Interest & Impact

Downloads

0 since deposited on 30 Apr 2024
0 in the past 12 months

Citations

5 Citations in Web of Science ®
6 Citations in Scopus

Search

in Google Scholar™

Services

Actions (login required)

Edit item

Actions (login required)

Edit item