Positional accuracy of a single implant analog in additively manufactured casts in biobased model resin.

Türksayar, Almira Ada Diken; Demirel, Münir; Petersmann, Sandra; Spintzyk, Sebastian; Donmez, Mustafa Borga (2024). Positional accuracy of a single implant analog in additively manufactured casts in biobased model resin. (In Press). Journal of dentistry, 146, p. 105037. Elsevier 10.1016/j.jdent.2024.105037

[img] Text
1-s2.0-S0300571224002070-main.pdf - Accepted Version
Restricted to registered users only until 2 May 2025.
Available under License Publisher holds Copyright.

Download (1MB) | Request a copy

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the positional accuracy of implant analogs in biobased model resin by comparing them to that of implant analogs in model resin casts and conventional analogs in dental stone casts.

METHODS

Polyvinylsiloxane impressions of a partially edentulous mandibular model with a single implant were made and poured in type IV dental stone. The same model was also digitized with an intraoral scanner and additively manufactured implant casts were fabricated in biobased model resin (FotoDent biobased model) and model resin (FotoDent model 2 beige-opaque) (n=8). All casts and the model were digitized with a laboratory scanner, and the scan files were imported into a 3-dimensional analysis software (Geomagic Control X). The linear deviations of 2 standardized points on the scan body used during digitization were automatically calculated on x-, y-, and z-axes. Average deviations were used to define precision, and 1-way analysis of variance and Tukey HSD tests were used for statistical analyses (α = 0.05).

RESULTS

Biobased model resin led to higher deviations than dental stone (all axes, P ≤ 0.031) and model resin (y-axis, P = 0.015). Biobased model resin resulted in the lowest precision of implant analog position (P ≤ 0.049). The difference in the positional accuracy of implant analogs of model resin and stone casts was nonsignificant (P ≥ 0.196).

CONCLUSIONS

Implant analogs in biobased model resin casts mostly had lower positional accuracy, whereas those in model resin and stone casts had similar positional accuracy. Regardless of the material, analogs deviated more towards mesial, while buccal deviations in additively manufactured casts and lingual deviations in stone casts were more prominent.

Item Type:

Journal Article (Original Article)

Division/Institute:

04 Faculty of Medicine > School of Dental Medicine

UniBE Contributor:

Dönmez, Mustafa-Borga

Subjects:

600 Technology > 610 Medicine & health

ISSN:

1879-176X

Publisher:

Elsevier

Language:

English

Submitter:

Pubmed Import

Date Deposited:

06 May 2024 14:52

Last Modified:

11 May 2024 00:16

Publisher DOI:

10.1016/j.jdent.2024.105037

PubMed ID:

38703808

Uncontrolled Keywords:

Additive manufacturing biobased resin implant analog implant cast positional accuracy

BORIS DOI:

10.48350/196530

URI:

https://boris.unibe.ch/id/eprint/196530

Actions (login required)

Edit item Edit item
Provide Feedback