Niemeyer, Samira Helena; Boss, Yanik; Maniewicz, Sabrina; Campus, Guglielmo; Tennert, Christian; Carvalho, Thiago S; Wierichs, Richard Johannes (2024). Decision making and management of root caries: a practice-based survey. Journal of dentistry, 146, p. 105062. Elsevier 10.1016/j.jdent.2024.105062
|
Text
1-s2.0-S0300571224002318-main.pdf - Accepted Version Available under License Creative Commons: Attribution (CC-BY). Download (948kB) | Preview |
OBJECTIVES
With increasing life expectancy and improved preventive measures, teeth are retained longer, leading to a rise in prevalence of root caries lesions (RCL). However, little is known about how dentists manage this condition. The present survey aimed to evaluate the knowledge of Swiss dentists on decision making and management of RCL.
METHOD
The survey evaluated dentists' knowledge, clinical routines, and demographics concerning RCL. Dentists were contacted via email and local newsletters, and 383 dentists from 25 (out of of 26) cantons responded. Mann-Whitney U test, χ2 test, intraclass correlation coefficients, Spearman correlation and Chi Square were used.
RESULTS
The dentists had a mean(SD) working experience of 22.5(12) years. Most dentists correctly classified an inactive (67%) and an active (81%)RCL. Although the inactive lesion did not call for restorative treatments, 61% of the dentist declared they would restore it. From the active lesion,83% would restore it. The invasive treatments leaned toward complete caries excavation with composite resin as preferred restorative material. There were significant correlations between material choice and expected success rates. Among the non-invasive options, oral hygiene instructions and (highly-)fluoridated toothpaste were favored. Most dentists declared having a recall system for such patients, with biannual follow-ups preferred. The dentists' place of education significantly influenced restorative decisions (p<0.001), while participants' age (≥60years) impacted activity status (p=0.048) and restorative decisions (p=0.02).
CONCLUSION
Material preferences for non-invasive or invasive management varied greatly and there were minimal differences in the management of inactive or an active RCL. Moreover, diagnosing active lesions appeared easier than diagnosing inactive ones.
CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE
Despite diverse material preferences for (non-)invasive treatments, a strong positive correlation existed between the chosen restorative material and its expected 2-year success rate. Moreover, diagnosing active lesions appeared easier than diagnosing inactive ones. The outcome emphasis the need to align guideline recommendations with their application in private dental practices.
Item Type: |
Journal Article (Original Article) |
---|---|
Division/Institute: |
04 Faculty of Medicine > School of Dental Medicine > Department of Preventive, Restorative and Pediatric Dentistry |
UniBE Contributor: |
Niemeyer, Samira Helena, Campus, Guglielmo Giuseppe, Tennert, Christian, Saads Carvalho, Thiago, Wierichs, Richard Johannes |
Subjects: |
600 Technology > 610 Medicine & health |
ISSN: |
1879-176X |
Publisher: |
Elsevier |
Language: |
English |
Submitter: |
Pubmed Import |
Date Deposited: |
21 May 2024 16:33 |
Last Modified: |
17 Jun 2024 00:15 |
Publisher DOI: |
10.1016/j.jdent.2024.105062 |
PubMed ID: |
38762078 |
Uncontrolled Keywords: |
Diagnosing managing root caries recording |
BORIS DOI: |
10.48350/196913 |
URI: |
https://boris.unibe.ch/id/eprint/196913 |