Mathew, A J; Lund, M L; Pedersen, M P; Rasmussen, S H; Glintborg, B; Loft, A G; Nissen, M J; Möller, B; Rodrigues, A M; Santos, F P; Rotar, Z; Tomšič, M; Relas, H; Peltomaa, R; Gudbjornsson, B; Löve, T J; Kocaer, S B; Koken Avsar, A; Midtbøll Ørnbjerg, L and Østergaard, M (2024). Enthesitis in a European registry-based cohort of patients with psoriatic arthritis treated with tumour necrosis factor inhibitors: clinical burden, patient-reported outcomes, and treatment response. Scandinavian journal of rheumatology, 53(4), pp. 237-247. Informa Healthcare 10.1080/03009742.2024.2336743
|
Text
Enthesitis_in_a_European_registry-based_cohort_of_patients_with_psoriatic_arthritis_treated_with_tumour_necrosis_factor_inhibitors_clinical_burden_p.pdf - Published Version Available under License Creative Commons: Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works (CC-BY-NC-ND). Download (1MB) | Preview |
OBJECTIVE
To explore the registration of enthesitis among biologic-naïve patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA) initiating tumour necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi) treatment across 12 European registries, compare the disease burden and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) between patients with and without enthesitis, and assess the enthesitis treatment response.
METHOD
Demographics, clinical characteristics, and PROs at first TNFi (TNFi-1) initiation (baseline) were assessed in patients with PsA, diagnosed by a rheumatologist, with versus without assessment of entheses and between those with versus without enthesitis. Enthesitis scores and resolution frequency were identified at follow-up.
RESULTS
Of 10 547 patients in the European Spondyloarthritis (EuroSpA) Research Collaboration Network initiating TNFi, 1357 underwent evaluation for enthesitis. Eight registries included a validated scoring system for enthesitis. At baseline, 874 patients underwent entheses assessment [Maastricht Ankylosing Spondylitis Enthesitis Score (MASES) 485 patients, Spondyloarthritis Research Consortium of Canada (SPARCC) 389 patients]. Enthesitis was detected by MASES in 170/485 (35%, mean score ± sd 3.1 ± 2.4) and by SPARCC in 236/389 (61%, 4 ± 3.4). Achilles enthesitis was most frequent, by both MASES (unilateral/bilateral 28%/9%) and SPARCC (48%/18%). MASES/SPARCC baseline and follow-up scores for TNFi-1 were available for 100/105 patients. Of these, 63 patients (63%) (MASES) and 46 (43.8%) (SPARCC) achieved resolution of enthesitis. The site-specific enthesitis resolution was overall lower at SPARCC sites (peripheral; 63-80%) than at MASES sites (mainly axial; 82-100%) following TNFi-1. Disease activity and PROs were worse in patients with versus without enthesitis.
CONCLUSION
Entheseal assessments are only registered in a minority of patients with PsA in routine care. When assessed, enthesitis was common, and a substantial proportion demonstrated resolution following treatment with TNFi-1.
Item Type: |
Journal Article (Original Article) |
---|---|
Division/Institute: |
04 Faculty of Medicine > Department of Dermatology, Urology, Rheumatology, Nephrology, Osteoporosis (DURN) > Clinic of Rheumatology and Immunology |
UniBE Contributor: |
Möller, Burkhard |
Subjects: |
600 Technology > 610 Medicine & health |
ISSN: |
0300-9742 |
Publisher: |
Informa Healthcare |
Language: |
English |
Submitter: |
Pubmed Import |
Date Deposited: |
22 May 2024 08:10 |
Last Modified: |
20 Jun 2024 00:15 |
Publisher DOI: |
10.1080/03009742.2024.2336743 |
PubMed ID: |
38771017 |
BORIS DOI: |
10.48350/196961 |
URI: |
https://boris.unibe.ch/id/eprint/196961 |