Khristenko, Ekaterina; Gaida, Matthias M; Tjaden, Christine; Steinle, Verena; Loos, Martin; Krieger, Korbinian; Weber, Tim F; Kauczor, Hans-Ulrich; Klauß, Miriam; Mayer, Philipp (2024). Imaging differentiation of solid pseudopapillary neoplasms and neuroendocrine neoplasms of the pancreas. European journal of radiology open, 12(100576) Elsevier 10.1016/j.ejro.2024.100576
|
Text
1-s2.0-S2352047724000315-main.pdf - Published Version Available under License Creative Commons: Attribution (CC-BY). Download (4MB) | Preview |
PURPOSE
The present study aimed to compare the computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) features of solid pseudopapillary neoplasms (SPNs) and pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (pNENs).
METHOD
Lesion imaging features of 39 patients with SPNs and 127 patients with pNENs were retrospectively extracted from 104 CT and 91 MRI scans.
RESULTS
Compared to pNEN patients, SPN patients were significantly younger (mean age 51.8 yrs versus 32.7 yrs) and more often female (female: male ratio, 5.50:1 versus 1.19:1). Most SPNs and pNENs presented as well-defined lesions with an expansive growth pattern. SPNs more often appeared as round or ovoid lesions, compared to pNENs which showed a lobulated or irregular shape in more than half of cases (p<0.01). A surrounding capsule was detected in the majority of SPNs, but only in a minority of pNENs (<0.01). Hemorrhage occurred non-significantly more often in SPNs (p=0.09). Signal inhomogeneity in T1-fat-saturated (p<0.01) and T2-weighted imaging (p=0.046) as well as cystic degeneration (p<0.01) were more often observed in SPNs. Hyperenhancement in the arterial and portal-venous phase was more common in pNENs (p<0.01). Enlargement of locoregional lymph nodes (p<0.01) and liver metastases (p=0.03) were observed in some pNEN patients, but not in SPN patients. Multivariate logistic regression identified the presence of a capsule (p<0.01), absence of arterial hyperenhancement (p<0.01), and low patient age (p<0.01), as independent predictors for SPN.
CONCLUSIONS
The present study provides three key features for differentiating SPNs from pNENs extracted from a large patient cohort: presence of a capsule, absence of arterial hyperenhancement, and low patient age.
Item Type: |
Journal Article (Original Article) |
---|---|
Division/Institute: |
04 Faculty of Medicine > Department of Radiology, Neuroradiology and Nuclear Medicine (DRNN) > Clinic of Nuclear Medicine |
UniBE Contributor: |
Krieger, Korbinian |
Subjects: |
600 Technology > 610 Medicine & health |
ISSN: |
2352-0477 |
Publisher: |
Elsevier |
Language: |
English |
Submitter: |
Pubmed Import |
Date Deposited: |
18 Jun 2024 09:16 |
Last Modified: |
20 Jun 2024 03:00 |
Publisher DOI: |
10.1016/j.ejro.2024.100576 |
PubMed ID: |
38882634 |
Uncontrolled Keywords: |
Frantz tumor computed tomography magnetic resonance imaging pancreatic neuroendocrine carcinoma pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasm solid pseudopapillary neoplasm |
BORIS DOI: |
10.48350/197890 |
URI: |
https://boris.unibe.ch/id/eprint/197890 |