The evaluation of a stepped care approach for early intervention of borderline personality disorder.

Cavelti, Marialuisa; Blaha, Yasmine; Lerch, Stefan; Hertel, Christian; Berger, Thomas; Reichl, Corinna; Koenig, Julian; Kaess, Michael (2024). The evaluation of a stepped care approach for early intervention of borderline personality disorder. Borderline Personality Disorder and Emotion Dysregulation, 11(1) BioMed Central 10.1186/s40479-024-00256-1

[img]
Preview
Text
s40479-024-00256-1.pdf - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons: Attribution (CC-BY).

Download (982kB) | Preview

BACKGROUND

The current study evaluated the stepped care approach applied in AtR!Sk; a specialized outpatient clinic for adolescents with BPD features that offers a brief psychotherapeutic intervention (Cutting Down Program; CDP) to all patients, followed by a more intensive Dialectical Behavioral Therapy for Adolescents (DBT-A) for those whose symptoms persist.

METHODS

The sample consisted of 127 patients recruited from two AtR!Sk clinics. The number of BPD criteria, psychosocial functioning, severity of overall psychopathology, number of days with non-suicidal self-injury (NSSI; past month), and the number of suicide attempts (last 3 months) were assessed at clinic entry (T0), after CDP (T1), and at 1- and 2-year follow-up (T2, T3). Based on the T1 assessment (decision criteria for DBT-A: ≥ 3 BPD criteria & ZAN-BPD ≥ 6), participants were allocated into three groups; CDP only (n = 74), CDP + DBT-A (eligible and accepted; n = 36), CDP no DBT-A (eligible, but declined; n = 17).

RESULTS

CDP only showed significantly fewer BPD criteria (T2: β = 3.42, p < 0.001; T3: β = 1.97, p = 0.008), higher levels of psychosocial functioning (T2: β = -1.23, p < 0.001; T3: β = -1.66, p < 0.001), and lower severity of overall psychopathology (T2: β = 1.47, p < 0.001; T3: β = 1.43, p = 0.002) over two years compared with CDP no DBT-A, while no group differences were found with regard to NSSI and suicide attempts. There were no group differences between CDP + DBT-A and CDP no DBT-A, neither at T2 nor at T3.

DISCUSSION

The findings support the decision criterion for the offer of a more intense therapy after CDP. However, there was no evidence for the efficacy of additional DBT-A, which might be explained by insufficient statistical power in the current analysis.

Item Type:

Journal Article (Original Article)

Division/Institute:

04 Faculty of Medicine > University Psychiatric Services > University Hospital of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Psychotherapy
07 Faculty of Human Sciences > Institute of Psychology > Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy
04 Faculty of Medicine > University Psychiatric Services > University Hospital of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Psychotherapy > Research Division

UniBE Contributor:

Cavelti, Marialuisa (A), Blaha, Yasmine Barbara, Lerch, Stefan, Hertel, Christian, Berger, Thomas (B), Reichl, Corinna, Kaess, Michael

Subjects:

600 Technology > 610 Medicine & health

ISSN:

2051-6673

Publisher:

BioMed Central

Language:

English

Submitter:

Pubmed Import

Date Deposited:

18 Jun 2024 10:23

Last Modified:

19 Jun 2024 06:19

Publisher DOI:

10.1186/s40479-024-00256-1

PubMed ID:

38886843

Uncontrolled Keywords:

Adolescence Borderline personality disorder Cutting down program Dialectical behavioral therapy Early intervention Stepped care

BORIS DOI:

10.48350/197907

URI:

https://boris.unibe.ch/id/eprint/197907

Actions (login required)

Edit item Edit item
Provide Feedback