Consistencies in Follow-up After Radical Cystectomy for Bladder Cancer: A Framework Based on Expert Practices Collaboratively Developed by the European Association of Urology Bladder Cancer Guideline Panels.

Mertens, Laura S; Bruins, Harman Maxim; Contieri, Roberto; Babjuk, Marek; Rai, Bhavan P; Puig, Albert Carrión; Escrig, Jose Luis Dominguez; Gontero, Paolo; van der Heijden, Antoine G; Liedberg, Fredrik; Martini, Alberto; Masson-Lecomte, Alexandra; Meijer, Richard P; Mostafid, Hugh; Neuzillet, Yann; Pradere, Benjamin; Redlef, John; van Rhijn, Bas W G; Rouanne, Matthieu; Rouprêt, Morgan; ... (2024). Consistencies in Follow-up After Radical Cystectomy for Bladder Cancer: A Framework Based on Expert Practices Collaboratively Developed by the European Association of Urology Bladder Cancer Guideline Panels. (In Press). European urology oncology Elsevier 10.1016/j.euo.2024.05.010

Text 1-s2.0-S258893112400141X-main.pdf - Published Version Restricted to registered users only Available under License Publisher holds Copyright. Download (699kB) | Request a copy

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

There is no standardized regimen for follow-up after radical cystectomy (RC) for bladder cancer (BC). To address this gap, we conducted a multicenter study involving urologist members from the European Association of Urology (EAU) bladder cancer guideline panels. Our objective was to identify consistent post-RC follow-up strategies and develop a practice-based framework based on expert opinion.

METHODS

We surveyed 27 urologist members of the EAU guideline panels for non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer and muscle-invasive and metastatic bladder cancer using a pre-tested questionnaire with dichotomous responses. The survey inquired about follow-up strategies after RC and the use of risk-adapted strategies. Consistency was defined as >75% affirmative responses for follow-up practices commencing 3 mo after RC. Descriptive statistics were used for analysis.

KEY FINDINGS AND LIMITATIONS

We received responses from 96% of the panel members, who provided data from 21 European hospitals. Risk-adapted follow-up is used in 53% of hospitals, with uniform criteria for high-risk (at least ≥pT3 or pN+) and low-risk ([y]pT0/a/1N0) cases. In the absence of agreement for risk-based follow up, a non-risk-adapted framework for follow-up was developed. Higher conformity was observed within the initial 3 yr, followed by a decline in subsequent follow-up. Follow-up was most frequent during the first year, including patient assessments, physical examinations, and laboratory tests. Computed tomography of the chest and abdomen/pelvis was the most common imaging modality, initially at least biannually, and then annually from years 2 to 5. There was a lack of consistency for continuing follow-up beyond 10 yr after RC.

CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS

This practice-based post-RC follow-up framework developed by EAU bladder cancer experts may serve as a valuable guide for urologists in the absence of prospective randomized studies.

PATIENT SUMMARY

We asked urologists from the EAU bladder cancer guideline panels about their patient follow-up after surgical removal of the bladder for bladder cancer. We found that although urologists have varying approaches, there are also common follow-up practices across the panel. We created a practical follow-up framework that could be useful for urologists in their day-to-day practice.

Interest & Impact

Downloads

0 since deposited on 25 Jun 2024
0 in the past 12 months

Citations

5 Citations in Web of Science ®
6 Citations in Scopus

Search

in Google Scholar™

Services

Actions (login required)

Edit item

Actions (login required)

Edit item