Safety of treating acute pulmonary embolism at home: an individual patient data meta-analysis.

Luijten, Dieuwke; Douillet, Delphine; Luijken, Kim; Tromeur, Cecile; Penaloza, Andrea; Hugli, Olivier; Aujesky, Drahomir; Barco, Stefano; Bledsoe, Joseph R; Chang, Kyle E; Couturaud, Francis; den Exter, Paul L; Font, Carme; Huisman, Menno V; Jimenez, David; Kabrhel, Christopher; Kline, Jeffrey A; Konstantinides, Stavros; van Mens, Thijs; Otero, Remedios; ... (2024). Safety of treating acute pulmonary embolism at home: an individual patient data meta-analysis. European heart journal, 45(32), pp. 2933-2950. Oxford University Press 10.1093/eurheartj/ehae378

[img]
Preview
Text
ehae378.pdf - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons: Attribution (CC-BY).

Download (1MB) | Preview

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Home treatment is considered safe in acute pulmonary embolism (PE) patients selected by a validated triage tool (e.g. simplified PE severity index score or Hestia rule), but there is uncertainty regarding the applicability in underrepresented subgroups. The aim was to evaluate the safety of home treatment by performing an individual patient-level data meta-analysis.

METHODS

Ten prospective cohort studies or randomized controlled trials were identified in a systematic search, totalling 2694 PE patients treated at home (discharged within 24 h) and identified by a predefined triage tool. The 14- and 30-day incidences of all-cause mortality and adverse events (combined endpoint of recurrent venous thromboembolism, major bleeding, and/or all-cause mortality) were evaluated. The relative risk (RR) for 14- and 30-day mortalities and adverse events is calculated in subgroups using a random effects model.

RESULTS

The 14- and 30-day mortalities were 0.11% [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.0-0.24, I2 = 0) and 0.30% (95% CI 0.09-0.51, I2 = 0). The 14- and 30-day incidences of adverse events were 0.56% (95% CI 0.28-0.84, I2 = 0) and 1.2% (95% CI 0.79-1.6, I2 = 0). Cancer was associated with increased 30-day mortality [RR 4.9; 95% prediction interval (PI) 2.7-9.1; I2 = 0]. Pre-existing cardiopulmonary disease, abnormal troponin, and abnormal (N-terminal pro-)B-type natriuretic peptide [(NT-pro)BNP] at presentation were associated with an increased incidence of 14-day adverse events [RR 3.5 (95% PI 1.5-7.9, I2 = 0), 2.5 (95% PI 1.3-4.9, I2 = 0), and 3.9 (95% PI 1.6-9.8, I2 = 0), respectively], but not mortality. At 30 days, cancer, abnormal troponin, and abnormal (NT-pro)BNP were associated with an increased incidence of adverse events [RR 2.7 (95% PI 1.4-5.2, I2 = 0), 2.9 (95% PI 1.5-5.7, I2 = 0), and 3.3 (95% PI 1.6-7.1, I2 = 0), respectively].

CONCLUSIONS

The incidence of adverse events in home-treated PE patients, selected by a validated triage tool, was very low. Patients with cancer had a three- to five-fold higher incidence of adverse events and death. Patients with increased troponin or (NT-pro)BNP had a three-fold higher risk of adverse events, driven by recurrent venous thromboembolism and bleeding.

Item Type:

Journal Article (Original Article)

Division/Institute:

04 Faculty of Medicine > Department of General Internal Medicine (DAIM) > Clinic of General Internal Medicine

UniBE Contributor:

Aujesky, Drahomir

Subjects:

600 Technology > 610 Medicine & health

ISSN:

1522-9645

Publisher:

Oxford University Press

Language:

English

Submitter:

Pubmed Import

Date Deposited:

18 Jul 2024 13:16

Last Modified:

22 Aug 2024 00:15

Publisher DOI:

10.1093/eurheartj/ehae378

PubMed ID:

38993086

Uncontrolled Keywords:

Clinical decision-making Early discharge Emergency care Outpatient care Pulmonary embolism

BORIS DOI:

10.48350/198975

URI:

https://boris.unibe.ch/id/eprint/198975

Actions (login required)

Edit item Edit item
Provide Feedback