Validity of different algorithmic methods to identify hospital readmissions from routinely coded medical data.

Havranek, Michael M; Dahlem, Yuliya; Bilger, Selina; Rüter, Florian; Ehbrecht, Daniela; Oliveira, Leonel; Moos, Rudolf M; Westerhoff, Christian; Gemperli, Armin; Beck, Thomas (2024). Validity of different algorithmic methods to identify hospital readmissions from routinely coded medical data. (In Press). Journal of Hospital Medicine Wiley 10.1002/jhm.13468

[img]
Preview
Text
Journal_of_Hospital_Medicine_-_2024_-_Havranek_-_Validity_of_different_algorithmic_methods_to_identify_hospital.pdf - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons: Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works (CC-BY-NC-ND).

Download (640kB) | Preview

BACKGROUND

Hospital readmission rates are used for quality and pay-for-performance initiatives. To identify readmissions from administrative data, two commonly employed methods are focusing either on unplanned readmissions (used by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, CMS) or potentially avoidable readmissions (used by commercial vendors such as SQLape or 3 M). However, it is not known which of these methods has higher criterion validity and can more accurately identify actually avoidable readmissions.

OBJECTIVES

A manual record review based on data from seven hospitals was used to compare the validity of the methods by CMS and SQLape.

METHODS

Seven independent reviewers reviewed 738 single inpatient stays. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and F1 score were examined to characterize the ability of an original CMS method, an adapted version of the CMS method, and the SQLape method to identify unplanned, potentially avoidable, and actually avoidable readmissions.

RESULTS

Both versions of the CMS method had greater sensitivity (92/86% vs. 62%) and a higher PPV (84/91% vs. 71%) than the SQLape method, in terms of identifying their outcomes of interest (unplanned vs. potentially avoidable readmissions, respectively). To distinguish actually avoidable readmissions, the two versions of the CMS method again displayed higher sensitivity (90/85% vs. 66%), although the PPV did not differ significantly between the different methods.

CONCLUSIONS

Thus, the CMS method has both higher criterion validity and greater sensitivity for identifying actually avoidable readmissions, compared with the SQLape method. Consequently, the CMS method should primarily be used for quality initiatives.

Item Type:

Journal Article (Original Article)

Division/Institute:

04 Faculty of Medicine > Department of General Internal Medicine (DAIM) > Clinic of General Internal Medicine

UniBE Contributor:

Beck, Thomas A.

Subjects:

600 Technology > 610 Medicine & health

ISSN:

1553-5606

Publisher:

Wiley

Language:

English

Submitter:

Pubmed Import

Date Deposited:

29 Jul 2024 14:23

Last Modified:

29 Jul 2024 14:32

Publisher DOI:

10.1002/jhm.13468

PubMed ID:

39051630

BORIS DOI:

10.48350/199305

URI:

https://boris.unibe.ch/id/eprint/199305

Actions (login required)

Edit item Edit item
Provide Feedback