URycki, Dawn R.; Kirtane, Anish A.; Aronoff, Rachel; Avila, Colton C.; Blackman, Rosetta C.; Carraro, Luca; Evrard, Olivier; Good, Stephen P.; Hoyos J., Diana C.; López‐Rodríguez, Nieves; Mora, Demetrio; Schadewell, Yvonne; Schilling, Oliver S.; Ceperley, Natalie C. (2024). A new flow path: eDNA connecting hydrology and biology. WIREs Water Wiley 10.1002/wat2.1749
|
Text
WIREs_Water_-_2024_-_URycki_-_A_new_flow_path_eDNA_connecting_hydrology_and_biology.pdf - Published Version Available under License Creative Commons: Attribution-Noncommercial (CC-BY-NC). Download (8MB) | Preview |
Environmental DNA (eDNA) has revolutionized ecological research, particularly for biodiversity assessment in various environments, most notably aquatic media. Environmental DNA analysis allows for non-invasive and rapid species detection across multiple taxonomic groups within a single sample, making it especially useful for identifying rare or invasive species. Due to dynamic hydrological processes, eDNA samples from running waters may represent biodiversity from broad contributing areas, which is convenient from a biomonitoring perspective but also challenging, as hydrological knowledge is required for meaningful biological interpretation. Hydrologists could also benefit from eDNA to address unsolved questions, particularly concerning water movement through catchments. While naturally occurring abiotic tracers have advanced our understanding of water age distribution in catchments, for example, current geochemical tracers cannot fully elucidate the timing and flow paths of water through landscapes. Conversely, biological tracers, owing to their immense diversity and interactions with the environment, could offer more detailed information on the sources and flow paths of water to the stream. The informational capacity of eDNA as a tracer, however, is determined by the ability to interpret the complex biological heterogeneity at a study site, which arguably requires both biological and hydrological expertise. As eDNA data has become increasingly available as part of biomonitoring campaigns, we argue that accompanying eDNA surveys with hydrological observations could enhance our understanding of both biological and hydrological processes; we identify opportunities, challenges, and needs for further interdisciplinary collaboration; and we highlight eDNA's potential as a bridge between hydrology and biology, which could foster both domains.
Item Type: |
Journal Article (Original Article) |
---|---|
Division/Institute: |
08 Faculty of Science > Institute of Geography > Physical Geography > Unit Hydrology 10 Strategic Research Centers > Oeschger Centre for Climate Change Research (OCCR) 08 Faculty of Science > Institute of Geography 08 Faculty of Science > Institute of Geography > Physical Geography |
UniBE Contributor: |
Ceperley, Natalie Claire |
Subjects: |
900 History > 910 Geography & travel 500 Science > 550 Earth sciences & geology 500 Science > 570 Life sciences; biology |
ISSN: |
2049-1948 |
Publisher: |
Wiley |
Funders: |
Organisations 220742 not found. |
Language: |
English |
Submitter: |
Natalie Claire Ceperley |
Date Deposited: |
05 Aug 2024 11:18 |
Last Modified: |
05 Aug 2024 11:18 |
Publisher DOI: |
10.1002/wat2.1749 |
BORIS DOI: |
10.48350/199486 |
URI: |
https://boris.unibe.ch/id/eprint/199486 |