Identifying the drivers of overall rating of cancer care: Insights from the second wave of the Swiss Cancer Patient Experiences study.

Jolidon, Vladimir; Eicher, Manuela; Peytremann-Bridevaux, Isabelle; Aebi, Stefan; Anchisi, Sandro; Bettini, Adrienne; Chalandon, Yves; Dietrich, Pierre-Yves; Duchosal, Michel A; Dürr, Donat; Peters, Solange; von Moos, Roger; Wicki, Andreas; Arditi, Chantal (2024). Identifying the drivers of overall rating of cancer care: Insights from the second wave of the Swiss Cancer Patient Experiences study. (In Press). Cancer Wiley 10.1002/cncr.35506

[img]
Preview
Text
Cancer_-_2024_-_Jolidon_-_Identifying_the_drivers_of_overall_rating_of_cancer_care__Insights_from_the_second_wave_of_the.pdf - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons: Attribution-Noncommercial (CC-BY-NC).

Download (292kB) | Preview

BACKGROUND

Patient experience surveys gather information on various aspects of care via numerous survey items. Identifying the most critical areas of patient experience to prioritize for quality care improvement can be challenging. The objective of this study was to determine which care experience items are the drivers influencing patients' overall rating of cancer care.

METHODS

Data from 2750 adult patients with cancer from the second wave of the Swiss Cancer Patient Experiences study were analyzed. This cross-sectional survey was conducted in eight Swiss hospitals from September 2021 to February 2022. Stepwise logistic regression examined the relationship between overall care rating and 29 patient experience items covering different patient-centered care dimensions while adjusting for sociodemographic and health variables.

RESULTS

Overall, patients rated their cancer care experience at 8.9 out of 10. Stepwise regression identified seven drivers contributing to overall care rating. The strongest drivers were "professionals worked well together" (odds ratio [OR], 4.81) and "tests were not repeated" (OR, 2.09) from the coordination and integration dimension, "offered support for symptoms during treatment" (OR, 2.11) from the physical comfort dimension, followed by "hospital staff ensured available home support" (OR, 1.99), "offered to see health professional for concerns" (OR, 1.91), "treatment options were explained" (OR, 1.75), and "involved in treatment decisions as desired" (OR, 1.68).

CONCLUSIONS

This study evaluated the care experiences of patients with cancer with a comprehensive tool that identified seven key factors independently associated with overall care rating. By concentrating on these areas, hospitals can not only improve the patient care experience but also efficiently allocate resources to quality improvement initiatives.

Item Type:

Journal Article (Original Article)

Division/Institute:

04 Faculty of Medicine > Department of Haematology, Oncology, Infectious Diseases, Laboratory Medicine and Hospital Pharmacy (DOLS) > Clinic of Medical Oncology

UniBE Contributor:

Aebi, Stefan

Subjects:

600 Technology > 610 Medicine & health

ISSN:

1097-0142

Publisher:

Wiley

Language:

English

Submitter:

Pubmed Import

Date Deposited:

09 Aug 2024 15:50

Last Modified:

09 Aug 2024 15:59

Publisher DOI:

10.1002/cncr.35506

PubMed ID:

39119752

Uncontrolled Keywords:

cancer care care pathway drivers overall rating overall satisfaction patient experience patient satisfaction patient survey patient‐centered care quality of care

BORIS DOI:

10.48350/199606

URI:

https://boris.unibe.ch/id/eprint/199606

Actions (login required)

Edit item Edit item
Provide Feedback