Does (dis)agreement reflect beliefs? An analysis of advocacy coalitions in Swiss pesticide policy

Wiget, Milena (2024). Does (dis)agreement reflect beliefs? An analysis of advocacy coalitions in Swiss pesticide policy. European policy analysis Wiley 10.1002/epa2.1219

Preview

Text European_Policy_Analysis_-_2024_-_Wiget_-_Does__dis_agreement_reflect_beliefs__An_analysis_of_advocacy_coalitions_in_Swiss.pdf - Published Version Available under License Creative Commons: Attribution (CC-BY). Download (1MB) | Preview

Agricultural pesticide use is a wicked sustainability challenge: Trade-offs exist between health, environmental, agro-economic, and socio-political objectives. Various actors involved have diverse beliefs regarding these trade-offs and policies to address the challenge. But to what extent does the agreement or disagreement between actors reflect belief similarities or differences, and thus, the formation of advocacy coalitions? To answer this question, the study draws on the advocacy coalition framework and investigates data from 54 key actors in the case of Swiss pesticide policy. The study explores the relationship between the actors' (dis)agreement relations and their beliefs using Random Forests. Coalitions are identified through block modeling and beliefs based on multi-attribute value theory. The study shows that the two relations are a good proxy for identifying coalitions with conflict lines concerning beliefs and presents an approach to exploring ideological reasons behind (dis)agreement relations that supports identifying conflicting beliefs relevant to future policy solutions.

Interest & Impact

Downloads

1 since deposited on 15 Aug 2024
1 in the past 12 months

Citations

5 Citations in Web of Science ®
6 Citations in Scopus

Search

in Google Scholar™

Services

Actions (login required)

Edit item

Actions (login required)

Edit item