Improved exercise ventilatory efficiency with nasal compared to oral breathing in cardiac patients.

Prisca, Eser; Pietro, Calamai; Anja, Kalberer; Laura, Stuetz; Huber, Sarina; Dominic, Kaesermann; Guler, Sabina; Wilhelm, Matthias (2024). Improved exercise ventilatory efficiency with nasal compared to oral breathing in cardiac patients. Frontiers in physiology, 15(1380562) Frontiers Research Foundation 10.3389/fphys.2024.1380562

Preview

Text fphys-15-1380562.pdf - Published Version Available under License Creative Commons: Attribution (CC-BY). Download (2MB) | Preview

Objectives: To assess whether nasal breathing improves exercise ventilatory efficiency in patients with heart failure (HF) or chronic coronary syndromes (CCS). Background: Exercise inefficient ventilation predicts disease progression and mortality in patients with cardiovascular diseases. In healthy people, improved ventilatory efficiency with nasal compared to oral breathing was found. Methods: Four study groups were recruited: Patients with HF, patients with CCS, old (age≥45 years) and young (age 20-40 years) healthy control subjects. After a 3-min warm-up, measurements of 5 min with once nasal and once oral breathing were performed in randomized order at 50% peak power on cycle ergometer. Ventilation and gas exchange parameters measured with spiroergometry were analysed by Wilcoxon paired-sample tests and linear mixed models adjusted for sex, height, weight and test order. Results: Groups comprised 15 HF, CCS, and young control and 12 old control. Ventilation/carbon dioxide production ( E/ CO2), ventilation ( E), breathing frequency (fR), and end-tidal oxygen partial pressure (PETO2) were significantly lower and tidal volume and end-tidal carbon dioxide partial pressure (PETCO2) significantly higher during nasal compared to oral breathing in all groups, with large effect sizes for most parameters. For patients with HF, median E/ CO2 was 35% lower, fR 26% lower, and PETCO2 10% higher with nasal compared to oral breathing, respectively. Exercise oscillatory ventilation (EOV) was present in 6 patients and markedly reduced with nasal breathing. Conclusion: Nasal breathing during submaximal exercise significantly improved ventilatory efficiency and abnormal breathing patterns (rapid shallow breathing and EOV) in 80% of our patients with HF and CCS.

Interest & Impact

Downloads

2 since deposited on 22 Aug 2024
2 in the past 12 months

Citations

5 Citations in Web of Science ®
6 Citations in Scopus

Search

in Google Scholar™

Services

Actions (login required)

Edit item

Actions (login required)

Edit item