Global control of sexually transmitted infections

Low, Nicola; Broutet, Nathalie; Adu-Sarkodie, Yaw; Barton, Pelham; Hossain, Mazeda; Hawkes, Sarah (2006). Global control of sexually transmitted infections. Lancet, 368(9551), pp. 2001-2016. London: Elsevier 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)69482-8

[img] Text
Low Lancet 2006.pdf - Published Version
Restricted to registered users only
Available under License Publisher holds Copyright.

Download (243kB) | Request a copy

Sexually transmitted infections other than HIV are important global health issues. They have, however, been neglected as a public-health priority and control efforts continue to fail. Sexually transmitted infections, by their nature, affect individuals, who are part of partnerships and larger sexual networks, and in turn populations. We propose a framework of individual, partnership, and population levels for examining the effects of sexually transmitted infections and interventions to control them. At the individual level we have a range of effective diagnostic tests, treatments, and vaccines. These options are unavailable or inaccessible in many resource-poor settings, where syndromic management remains the core intervention for individual case management. At the partnership level, partner notification and antenatal syphilis screening have the potential to prevent infection and re-infection. Interventions delivered to whole populations, or groups in whom the risks of infection and onward transmission are very high, have the greatest potential effect. Improvements to the infrastructure of treatment services can reduce the incidence of syphilis and gonorrhoea or urethritis. Strong evidence for the effectiveness of most other interventions on population-level outcomes is, however, scarce. Effective action requires a multifaceted approach including better basic epidemiological and surveillance data, high quality evidence about effectiveness of individual interventions and programmes, better methods to get effective interventions onto the policy agenda, and better advocacy and more commitment to get them implemented properly. We must not allow stigma, prejudice, and moral opposition to obstruct the goals of infectious disease control.

Item Type:

Journal Article (Further Contribution)

Division/Institute:

04 Faculty of Medicine > Pre-clinic Human Medicine > Institute of Social and Preventive Medicine (ISPM)

UniBE Contributor:

Low, Nicola

Subjects:

600 Technology > 610 Medicine & health

ISSN:

0140-6736

ISBN:

17141708

Publisher:

Elsevier

Language:

English

Submitter:

Factscience Import

Date Deposited:

04 Oct 2013 14:48

Last Modified:

09 Sep 2017 02:23

Publisher DOI:

10.1016/S0140-6736(06)69482-8

PubMed ID:

17141708

Web of Science ID:

000242593300033

BORIS DOI:

10.7892/boris.20088

URI:

https://boris.unibe.ch/id/eprint/20088 (FactScience: 3206)

Actions (login required)

Edit item Edit item
Provide Feedback