Accuracy of diagnostic tests for clinically suspected upper extremity deep vein thrombosis: a systematic review

Di Nisio, M; Van Sluis, G L; Bossuyt, P M M; Büller, H R; Porreca, E; Rutjes, A W S (2010). Accuracy of diagnostic tests for clinically suspected upper extremity deep vein thrombosis: a systematic review. Journal of thrombosis and haemostasis, 8(4), pp. 684-692. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell 10.1111/j.1538-7836.2010.03771.x

[img] Text
DiNisio JThrombHaemost 2010.pdf - Published Version
Restricted to registered users only
Available under License Publisher holds Copyright.

Download (242kB) | Request a copy

The best available test for the diagnosis of upper extremity deep venous thrombosis (UEDVT) is contrast venography. The aim of this systematic review was to assess whether the diagnostic accuracy of other tests for clinically suspected UEDVT is high enough to justify their use in clinical practise and to evaluate if any test can replace venography.

Item Type:

Journal Article (Original Article)

Division/Institute:

04 Faculty of Medicine > Pre-clinic Human Medicine > Institute of Social and Preventive Medicine

UniBE Contributor:

Rutjes, Anne

ISSN:

1538-7836

Publisher:

Wiley-Blackwell

Language:

English

Submitter:

Factscience Import

Date Deposited:

04 Oct 2013 14:12

Last Modified:

16 Jul 2018 14:14

Publisher DOI:

10.1111/j.1538-7836.2010.03771.x

PubMed ID:

20141579

Web of Science ID:

000275922500011

BORIS DOI:

10.7892/boris.2235

URI:

https://boris.unibe.ch/id/eprint/2235 (FactScience: 204574)

Actions (login required)

Edit item Edit item
Provide Feedback