Radiofrequency electromagnetic field exposure and non-specific symptoms of ill health: A systematic review

Röösli, Martin (2008). Radiofrequency electromagnetic field exposure and non-specific symptoms of ill health: A systematic review. Environmental research, 107(2), pp. 277-87. San Diego, Calif.: Elsevier 10.1016/j.envres.2008.02.003

[img] Text
Röösli EnvironRes 2008.pdf - Published Version
Restricted to registered users only
Available under License Publisher holds Copyright.

Download (231kB) | Request a copy

This article is a systematic review of whether everyday exposure to radiofrequency electromagnetic field (RF-EMF) causes symptoms, and whether some individuals are able to detect low-level RF-EMF (below the ICNIRP [International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection] guidelines). Peer-reviewed articles published before August 2007 were identified by means of a systematic literature search. Meta-analytic techniques were used to pool the results from studies investigating the ability to discriminate active from sham RF-EMF exposure. RF-EMF discrimination was investigated in seven studies including a total of 182 self-declared electromagnetic hypersensitive (EHS) individuals and 332 non-EHS individuals. The pooled correct field detection rate was 4.2% better than expected by chance (95% CI: -2.1 to 10.5). There was no evidence that EHS individuals could detect presence or absence of RF-EMF better than other persons. There was little evidence that short-term exposure to a mobile phone or base station causes symptoms based on the results of eight randomized trials investigating 194 EHS and 346 non-EHS individuals in a laboratory. Some of the trials provided evidence for the occurrence of nocebo effects. In population based studies an association between symptoms and exposure to RF-EMF in the everyday environment was repeatedly observed. This review showed that the large majority of individuals who claims to be able to detect low level RF-EMF are not able to do so under double-blind conditions. If such individuals exist, they represent a small minority and have not been identified yet. The available observational studies do not allow differentiating between biophysical from EMF and nocebo effects.

Item Type:

Journal Article (Original Article)

Division/Institute:

04 Faculty of Medicine > Pre-clinic Human Medicine > Institute of Social and Preventive Medicine

UniBE Contributor:

Röösli, Martin

ISSN:

0013-9351

ISBN:

18359015

Publisher:

Elsevier

Language:

English

Submitter:

Factscience Import

Date Deposited:

04 Oct 2013 14:56

Last Modified:

18 Jun 2015 11:58

Publisher DOI:

10.1016/j.envres.2008.02.003

PubMed ID:

18359015

Web of Science ID:

000256331200017

BORIS DOI:

10.7892/boris.23922

URI:

https://boris.unibe.ch/id/eprint/23922 (FactScience: 45179)

Actions (login required)

Edit item Edit item
Provide Feedback