Effect of intensive lipid lowering with atorvastatin on renal function in patients with coronary heart disease: the Treating to New Targets (TNT) study

Shepherd, James; Kastelein, John J P; Bittner, Vera; Deedwania, Prakash; Breazna, Andrei; Dobson, Stephen; Wilson, Daniel J; Zuckerman, Andrea; Wenger, Nanette K (2007). Effect of intensive lipid lowering with atorvastatin on renal function in patients with coronary heart disease: the Treating to New Targets (TNT) study. Clinical journal of the American Society of Nephrology, 2(6), pp. 1131-9. Washington, D.C.: American Society of Nephrology 10.2215/CJN.04371206

Full text not available from this repository. (Request a copy)

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Data suggest that atorvastatin may be nephroprotective. This subanalysis of the Treating to New Targets study investigated how intensive lipid lowering with 80 mg of atorvastatin affects renal function when compared with 10 mg in patients with coronary heart disease. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, ; MEASUREMENTS: A total of 10,001 patients with coronary heart disease and LDL cholesterol levels of <130 mg/dl were randomly assigned to double-blind therapy with 10 or 80 mg/d atorvastatin. Estimated GFR using the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease equation was compared at baseline and at the end of follow-up in 9656 participants with complete renal data. RESULTS: Mean estimated GFR at baseline was 65.6 +/- 11.4 ml/min per 1.73 m2 in the 10-mg group and 65.0 +/- 11.2 ml/min per 1.73 m2 in the 80-mg group. At the end of follow-up (median time to final creatinine measurement 59.5 months), mean change in estimated GFR showed an increase of 3.5 +/- 0.14 ml/min per 1.73 m2 with 10 mg and 5.2 +/- 0.14 ml/min per 1.73 m2 with 80 mg (P < 0.0001 for treatment difference). In the 80-mg arm, estimated GFR improved to > or = 60 ml/min per 1.73 m2 in significantly more patients and declined to < 60 ml/min per 1.73 m2 in significantly fewer patients than in the 10-mg arm. CONCLUSIONS: The expected 5-yr decline in renal function was not observed. Estimated GFR improved in both treatment groups but was significantly greater with 80 mg than with 10 mg, suggesting this benefit may be dosage related.

Item Type:

Journal Article (Original Article)

Division/Institute:

04 Faculty of Medicine > Department of Intensive Care, Emergency Medicine and Anaesthesiology (DINA) > Clinic and Policlinic for Anaesthesiology and Pain Therapy

UniBE Contributor:

Bittner, Vladimir

ISSN:

1555-9041

ISBN:

17942759

Publisher:

American Society of Nephrology

Language:

English

Submitter:

Jeannie Wurz

Date Deposited:

04 Oct 2013 14:57

Last Modified:

23 Jan 2018 12:17

Publisher DOI:

10.2215/CJN.04371206

PubMed ID:

17942759

Web of Science ID:

000250539400010

URI:

https://boris.unibe.ch/id/eprint/24552 (FactScience: 51488)

Actions (login required)

Edit item Edit item
Provide Feedback