Pestel, G; Fukui, K (2009). [Arterial pressure curve and fluid status.]. Anaesthesist, 58(4), pp. 415-420. Heidelberg: Springer-Medizin-Verlag 10.1007/s00101-009-1526-z
|
Text
Pestel-Fukui2009_Article_ArteriellePulskurveUndVolumens.pdf - Published Version Available under License Publisher holds Copyright. Download (554kB) | Preview |
Fluid optimization is a major contributor to improved outcome in patients. Unfortunately, anesthesiologists are often in doubt whether an additional fluid bolus will improve the hemodynamics of the patient or not as excess fluid may even jeopardize the condition. This article discusses physiological concepts of liberal versus restrictive fluid management followed by a discussion on the respective capabilities of various monitors to predict fluid responsiveness. The parameter difference in pulse pressure (dPP), derived from heart-lung interaction in mechanically ventilated patients is discussed in detail. The dPP cutoff value of 13% to predict fluid responsiveness is presented together with several assessment techniques of dPP. Finally, confounding variables on dPP measurements, such as ventilation parameters, pneumoperitoneum and use of norepinephrine are also mentioned.
Item Type: |
Journal Article (Original Article) |
---|---|
Division/Institute: |
04 Faculty of Medicine > Department of Intensive Care, Emergency Medicine and Anaesthesiology (DINA) > Clinic and Policlinic for Anaesthesiology and Pain Therapy |
UniBE Contributor: |
Pestel, Gunther Jürgen |
ISSN: |
0003-2417 |
ISBN: |
19326052 |
Publisher: |
Springer-Medizin-Verlag |
Language: |
English |
Submitter: |
Jeannie Wurz |
Date Deposited: |
04 Oct 2013 15:03 |
Last Modified: |
05 Dec 2022 14:19 |
Publisher DOI: |
10.1007/s00101-009-1526-z |
PubMed ID: |
19326052 |
Web of Science ID: |
000265397000015 |
BORIS DOI: |
10.48350/27289 |
URI: |
https://boris.unibe.ch/id/eprint/27289 (FactScience: 105903) |