Gillmann, Gerhard; Minder, C E (2009). On Graphically Checking Goodness-of-fit of Binary Logistic Regression Models. Methods of information in medicine, 48(3), pp. 306-310. Stuttgart: Schattauer 10.3414/ME0571
Text
Gillmann MethodsInfMed 2009.pdf - Published Version Restricted to registered users only Available under License Publisher holds Copyright. Download (82kB) |
OBJECTIVES: This paper is concerned with checking goodness-of-fit of binary logistic regression models. For the practitioners of data analysis, the broad classes of procedures for checking goodness-of-fit available in the literature are described. The challenges of model checking in the context of binary logistic regression are reviewed. As a viable solution, a simple graphical procedure for checking goodness-of-fit is proposed. METHODS: The graphical procedure proposed relies on pieces of information available from any logistic analysis; the focus is on combining and presenting these in an informative way. RESULTS: The information gained using this approach is presented with three examples. In the discussion, the proposed method is put into context and compared with other graphical procedures for checking goodness-of-fit of binary logistic models available in the literature. CONCLUSION: A simple graphical method can significantly improve the understanding of any logistic regression analysis and help to prevent faulty conclusions.
Item Type: |
Journal Article (Further Contribution) |
---|---|
Division/Institute: |
04 Faculty of Medicine > Pre-clinic Human Medicine > Institute of Social and Preventive Medicine (ISPM) |
UniBE Contributor: |
Gillmann, Gerhard, Minder, Christoph Erwin |
ISSN: |
0026-1270 |
ISBN: |
19387509 |
Publisher: |
Schattauer |
Language: |
English |
Submitter: |
Factscience Import |
Date Deposited: |
04 Oct 2013 15:09 |
Last Modified: |
05 Dec 2022 14:21 |
Publisher DOI: |
10.3414/ME0571 |
PubMed ID: |
19387509 |
Web of Science ID: |
000266932600013 |
BORIS DOI: |
10.7892/boris.30315 |
URI: |
https://boris.unibe.ch/id/eprint/30315 (FactScience: 192687) |