How should bladder wall thickness be measured? A comparison of vaginal, perineal and abdominal ultrasound

Kuhn, Annette; Bank, Sybille; Robinson, Dudley; Klimek, Miriam; Kuhn, Peter; Raio, Luigi (2010). How should bladder wall thickness be measured? A comparison of vaginal, perineal and abdominal ultrasound. Neurourology and urodynamics, 29(8), pp. 1393-6. Hoboken, N.J.: Wiley-Liss 10.1002/nau.20876

Full text not available from this repository. (Request a copy)

Measurement of bladder wall thickness using transvaginal ultrasound has previously been shown to discriminate between women with diagnosed detrusor overactivity and those with urodynamic stress incontinence. So far, no comparison has been made between abdominal, perineal and vaginal route for the measurement of bladder wall thickness. The aim of this prospective study was to determine if abdominal, perineal and vaginal ultrasound measurements of bladder wall thickness are comparable with each other.

Item Type:

Journal Article (Original Article)

Division/Institute:

04 Faculty of Medicine > Department of Gynaecology, Paediatrics and Endocrinology (DFKE) > Clinic of Gynaecology

UniBE Contributor:

Kuhn, Annette and Raio, Luigi

ISSN:

0733-2467

Publisher:

Wiley-Liss

Language:

English

Submitter:

Factscience Import

Date Deposited:

04 Oct 2013 14:13

Last Modified:

06 Dec 2013 13:23

Publisher DOI:

10.1002/nau.20876

PubMed ID:

20976813

Web of Science ID:

000284016900006

URI:

https://boris.unibe.ch/id/eprint/3146 (FactScience: 206617)

Actions (login required)

Edit item Edit item
Provide Feedback