Compliance of the L5-S1 spinal unit: a comparative study between an unconstrained and a partially constrained system

Charrière, Eric; Beutler, Thomas; Caride, M; Mordasini, Philippe; Orr, T E; Zysset, Philippe (2006). Compliance of the L5-S1 spinal unit: a comparative study between an unconstrained and a partially constrained system. European spine journal, 15(1), pp. 74-81. Berlin: Springer 10.1007/s00586-004-0807-0

[img] Text
charriere-et-al-2006.pdf - Published Version
Restricted to registered users only
Available under License Publisher holds Copyright.

Download (422kB) | Request a copy

A comparison between an unconstrained and a partially constrained system for in vitro biomechanical testing of the L5-S1 spinal unit was conducted. The objective was to compare the compliance and the coupling of the L5-S1 unit measured with an unconstrained and a partially constrained test for the three major physiological motions of the human spine. Very few studies have compared unconstrained and partially constrained testing systems using the same cadaveric functional spinal units (FSUs). Seven human L5-S1 units were therefore tested on both a pneumatic, unconstrained, and a servohydraulic, partially constrained system. Each FSU was tested along three motions: flexion-extension (FE), lateral bending (LB) and axial rotation (AR). The obtained kinematics on both systems is not equivalent, except for the FE case, where both motions are similar. The directions of coupled motions were similar for both tests, but their magnitudes were smaller in the partially constrained configuration. The use of a partially constrained system to characterize LB and AR of the lumbosacral FSU decreased significantly the measured stiffness of the segment. The unconstrained system is today's "gold standard" for the characterization of FSUs. The selected partially constrained method seems also to be an appropriate way to characterize FSUs for specific applications. Care should be taken using the latter method when the coupled motions are important.

Item Type:

Journal Article (Original Article)


04 Faculty of Medicine > Pre-clinic Human Medicine > Institute for Surgical Technology & Biomechanics ISTB [discontinued]

UniBE Contributor:

Beutler, Thomas and Zysset, Philippe


500 Science > 570 Life sciences; biology
600 Technology > 610 Medicine & health








Factscience Import

Date Deposited:

04 Oct 2013 15:21

Last Modified:

28 Jan 2015 02:41

Publisher DOI:


PubMed ID:


Web of Science ID:


Uncontrolled Keywords:

Biomechanics; Spine; Kinematics; Torque; Degree of freedom



URI: (FactScience: 204647)

Actions (login required)

Edit item Edit item
Provide Feedback