Cancer screening - principles, evaluation and implementation

Egger, Matthias; Zwahlen, Marcel; Cerny, Thomas (2013). Cancer screening - principles, evaluation and implementation. Therapeutische Umschau, 70(4), pp. 195-203. Bern: Huber 10.1024/0040-5930/a000390

[img] Text
Egger TherUmsch 2013_p195.pdf - Published Version
Restricted to registered users only
Available under License Publisher holds Copyright.

Download (481kB) | Request a copy

Screening for malignant disease aims to reduce the population risk of impaired health due to the tumor in question. Screening does not only entail testing but covers all steps required to achieve the intended reduction in risk, from the appropriate information of the population to a suitable therapy. Screening tests are performed in individuals free or unaware of any symptoms associated with the tumor. An essential condition is a recognizable pathological abnormality, which occurs without symptoms and represents a pre-clinical, early stage of the tumor. Overdiagnosis and overtreatment have only recently been recognized as important problems of screening for malignant disease. Overdiagnosis is defined as a screening-detected tumor that would never have led to symptoms. In prostate-specific antigen (PSA) screening for prostate cancer 50 % - 70 % of screening-detected cancers represent such overdiagnoses. Similarly, in the case of mammography screening 20 % - 30 % of screening-detected breast cancers are overdiagnoses. The evaluation of screening interventions is often affected by biases such as healthy screenee effects or length and lead time bias. Randomized controlled trials are therefore needed to examine the efficacy and effectiveness of screening interventions and to define the rate of adverse outcomes such as unnecessary diagnostic evaluations, overdiagnosis and overtreatment. Unfortunately there is no independent Swiss body comparable to the National Screening Committee in the United Kingdom or the United States Preventive Services Task Force, which examines screening tests and programs and develops recommendations. Clearly defined goals, a central organization responsible for inviting eligible individuals, documentation and quality assurance and balanced information of the public are important attributes of successful screening programs. In Switzerland the establishment of such programs is hampered by the highly fragmented, Federal health system which allows patients to access specialists directly.

Item Type:

Journal Article (Review Article)

Division/Institute:

04 Faculty of Medicine > Pre-clinic Human Medicine > Institute of Social and Preventive Medicine

UniBE Contributor:

Egger, Matthias and Zwahlen, Marcel

Subjects:

600 Technology > 610 Medicine & health
300 Social sciences, sociology & anthropology > 360 Social problems & social services

ISSN:

0040-5930

Publisher:

Huber

Language:

German

Submitter:

Doris Kopp Heim

Date Deposited:

15 Jan 2014 17:18

Last Modified:

10 Sep 2017 08:09

Publisher DOI:

10.1024/0040-5930/a000390

PubMed ID:

23535546

BORIS DOI:

10.7892/boris.39059

URI:

https://boris.unibe.ch/id/eprint/39059

Actions (login required)

Edit item Edit item
Provide Feedback